| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2006 SLG 2335 2006 SLD 2335 2006 CLC 1824 |
Lahore High Court
Civil Revision No.1894 of 2000, decision dated: 18-05-2006.
SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASLAM, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Revision No.1894 of 2000, decision dated: 18-05-2006.
SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASLAM, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
REHM ALI through L.Rs.s
VS
ANWAR BEGUM and 4 others
Law:
Section:
(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-------S. 48--Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art.181---Execution application---Limitation---Dismissal of appeal on 30-10-1985---Filing of execution application on 6-12-1994---Preparation of decree on 9-8-2000---Effect---Time for execution would run from date of decree prepared by the Court--Execution was within time. (b) Punjab Pre-emption Act (IX of 1991)--- ----S. 25---Deposit of decretal amount within time fixed in decree---Effect---Decree-holder on such deposit would be vested with title of suit property---Decree-holder, if in possession of suit property, would not be required to file execution application and make application before Revenue Officer for sanction of mutation of his name in place of -debtor. F.A. Khan v. The Government of Pakistan PLD 1964 SC 520 and Maulvi Abdul Qayyum v. Syed Ali Asghar Shah and 5 others 1992 SCMR 241 ref. Dr. Niaz Muhammad Mann and others v. Sh. Muhammad Ahmad and another 1988 SCMR 1016 rel. Malik Amjad Pervaiz for Petitioners. A.K. Dogar for Respondents. ORDER Civil Miscellaneous No.1310-C of 2005 SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASLAM, J.--- This is an application seeking review of the judgment dated 20-10-2004 passed in Civil Revision No.1894 of 2000 on the ground that the applicants were not served and proceeded ex parte on the basis of fictitious report; that the subsequent purchaser Kamran Afzal informed the petitioner of the order passed in this civil revision; and that there was no requirement in law to annex the copy of the decree sheet passed in R.S.A. No.944 of 1978. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents placed reliance on F.A. Khan v. The Government of Pakistan PLD 1964 SC 520 and Maulvi Abdul Qayyum v. Syed Ali Asghar Shah and 5 others 1992 SCMR 241 and submitted that it was bounden duty of the Court to prepare the decree sheet while affirming the judgment of the Appellate Court. 3. Heard. Record perused. 4. The regular second appeal was dismissed on 30-10-1985 affirming the judgment of the learned Appellate Court. Execution was filed on 6-12-1994. The respondents moved an application for preparation of the decree and it was prepared as mentioned in paragraph No.5 of theβ¦
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492