Case Details

Citation(s)
2009 SLG 3376 2009 SLD 3376 2009 PCRLJ 629
Peshawar High Court
Criminal Jail Appeal No.135/J and Criminal Revision No.39 of 2005, decided on 25th February, 2009.Date of hearing: 11th February, 2009.
Before Muhammad Alam Khan and Syed Yahya Zahid Gillani, JJ
Muhammad Iqbal Khan Kundi for Appellant. Farooq Akhtar for the State. Allah Nawaz for the Complainant.

SAIF-UR-REHMAN----Appellant

VERSUS

THE STATE----Respondent

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302(b)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Appreciation of evidence---Report was lodged after two and a half hours from the occurrence---Such delay in lodging report being a natural consequence, had sufficiently been explained by the prosecution in the evidence---Neither of the eye-witnesses was related to either party nor had got any cordial relation with any one of them; they were cross-examined at length, but nothing was brought on the record to show their interest with the deceased party or any motive to falsely charge accused; their testimony was confidence inspiring; and no inherent flaw was found therein---Presence of. said eye-witnesses could not be doubted as at the relevant time they were present in the lands in vicinity of their village---Eye-witness account was not in conflict with the medical evidence---Even if the eye-witness account was in conflict with medical evidence, the confidence inspiring ocular account could not be overlooked---Prosecution, in circumstances, had proved its case beyond any shadow of reasonable doubt---Guilt of accused had been proved by the testimony of two disinterested eye-witnesses whose statements could not be shattered in cross-examination---Accused, in circumstances, was rightly held guilty of the offence charged with---Evidence brought on record commensurated with the sentences awarded to accused because the family dispute existed in the background of the occurrence; and the exact cause of the offence was shrouded in mystery; and it was not discernible from the record of the case---No ground was available for enhancement of the sentence awarded to accused. Yaqoob Shah v. The State PLD 1976 SC 53; Muhammad Hanif v. The State PLD 1993 SC 895; Ghulamullah and another v. The State 1996 SCMR 187; Abdur Rehman v. The State 1998 SCMR 1778; Wahid v. The State PLD 2002 SC 62; Saeedullah Khan v. The State 1986 SCMR 1027; Muhammad Khan and another v. The State 1999 SCMR 1220; Muhammad Ilyas and another v. The State 1993 SCMR 1602; Riaz Masih alias Mithoo v. The State 1995 SCMR 1730 and Hussain v. The State 2006 PCr.LJ 934 rel. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD ALAM KHAN, J.---This is jail criminal appeal filed by the convict-appellant…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492