| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2004 SLG 1732 2004 SLD 1732 2004 CLC 209 |
Board of Revenue, Punjab
Review Petitions Nos.211, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227 and 228 of 2001, decision dated: 27-06-2003.
TARIQ YUSUF, MEMBER, JUDICIAL-III
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Review Petitions Nos.211, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227 and 228 of 2001, decision dated: 27-06-2003.
TARIQ YUSUF, MEMBER, JUDICIAL-III
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMAD FEROZE MALIK and 4 others
VS
NADIR ALI and 19 others
Law:
Section:
West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance (VI of 1960)-------Ss. 9 & 18---West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), S.163---Consolidation of holdings---Review---Confirmation of Consolidation Scheme of village---Assistant Commissioner/ Collector, after such confirmation, issued warrant of possession in favour of respondents in respect of land allocated to them during consolidation--Appeal of petitioner against order of Collector was accepted by Additional Commissioner and respondents' revision against order of Additional Commissioner having been accepted by Member, Board of Revenue, petitioner filed review petition against order of Member, Board of Revenue---Petitioner had contended that he being in continuous possession of disputed land as owner, delivery of possession thereof to respondents under S.18 of West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1960 was unwarranted---Argument of respondents was that they were entitled to possession of land allocated to them in consolidation and petitioner's claim to purchase the said land was baseless---Order passed by Member, Board of Revenue in revision was not maintainable; firstly, because mutations in respect of land in dispute were entered subsequent to the purchase by petitioner of said land; secondly, petitioner continued in possession of said land even after consolidation was confirmed; thirdly, sale was, completed in all aspects 'of law and right of petitioner was created thereby; fourthly, rights which were created, were not affected and persons who were allotted the land, had to be put in possession of the same; fifthly, petitioner was to step into the shoes of respondents on the basis of sale and thereby petitioner was entitled to possession; sixthly, there was no litigation regarding title of said land between the parties as petitioner was not right holder of said village and seventhly, claim lodged by respondents was time-barred. Muhammad Anwar Tiwana for Petitioners. Muhammad Hussain Khan Baloch for Respondents. ORDER This order shall dispose of all these eight review petitions as these are directed against the same order and contain identical issues of law/fact. 2. These review…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492