Case Details

Citation(s)
2002 SLG 2052 2002 SLD 2052 2002 CLC 1931

Complaint No.T/14 of 2000, decision dated: 29-06-2002
JUSTICE MUHAMMAD QAIM, JAN KHAN, CHAIRMAN, MUHAMMAD ALUM KHAN AND SYED REHMAN, MEMBERS
Nemo for the Complainant (being exempted).
Respondent in person. Sardar Shaukat Hayat, A.A.G. for the Government of N.W. F. P

Mst. SURRIYA BEGUMComplainant

VS

Law:

Section:

Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act (XXXV of 1973)-------S. 41---Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976, R.148---Professional misconduct---Representing conflicting interests---Withdrawal of complaint---Advocate was close relative of the complainant who was appointed special attorney by her---Grievance of the complainant was that the Advocate had accepted brief of the opponent of the complainant and such act of the Advocate was a professional misconduct---Plea raised by the Advocate was that the matter had been compromised by the complainant---Validity---Advocate was morally bound not to have betrayed the trust reposed by the complainant in him--­Any violation of the sacred trust by the Advocate would amount to professional misconduct---Withdrawal of complaint would not exonerate the Advocate because in a case of misconduct withdrawal could not exonerate the Advocate---Withdrawal of complaint could be taken as mitigating circumstance while determining the quantum of punishment---Tribunal found the Advocate guilty of professional misconduct but taking into consideration the compromise arrived at between, the parties only reprimanded him---Appeal was disposed of accordingly. Mst. Surriya v. Sohail, Advocate, Peshawar 1999 YLR 2315; 1992 CLC 1556; lrshad Khan v. Gohar Rahman Khatak, Advocate 2000 MLD 1264; Wajid Ali v. Zafar Khalid, Advocate 2000 MLD 1275 and Ali Rehman v. Zaheer-ud-Din-Baber, Advocate 2001 MLD 895 ref. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD ALAM KHAN (MEMBER)--- On 26-8-2000 Mst. Surriya Begum wife of Rehmat Ullah Khan, resident of D.1. Khan filed a complaint against Muhammad Aslam, Advocate, D.I. Khan, alleging therein, that a suit for partition was filed by Ghulam Fatima against Allah Nawaz etc. on 14-9-1995 in the Court of Civil Judge Ist Class, D.I. Khan which was decided on 4-7-1997 in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties to the effect that Allah Nawaz defendant will pay a sum of Rs.3,60,000 to each co-sharer in the disputed property. The share of Ghulam Fatima and Mussarat Bibi co-sharers was paid to them through Bank but the Shari share was not paid to the complainant rather Allah Nawaz defendant promised to pay the said…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492