Law:

Section:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)- ----Ss. 435, 497 & 498--Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860), Ss. 337-F(v), 337-F(i) & 34--Bail was granted subject to payment of specified amount as promised during punchayat--There was nothing in black and white on the file of Court as well as police file that accused had ever promised to pay a sum of specified amount by way of compensation to prosecution--Held: Imposition of condition of amount before enlarging the accused on bail was not justified and set aside by allowing revision petition--Accused would be immediately released on bail as ordered subject to furnishing surety bonds to satisfaction of trial Court. Order Brief facts giving rise to the instant revision petition are that the petitioner had applied for post-arrest bail in a case relating to FIR No. 46/05 dated 29.1.2005 under Sections 337-F(v), 337-F(i), 34, P.P.C. Police Station Jampur District Rajanpur. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge, vide his order dated 9.7.2005 granted the bail subject to payment of Rs. 19,000/- to the complainant by way of compensation as promised by the petitioner during a Punchayat. 2. The aforesaid order to the extent of imposition of the said condition is now under challenge through the instant revision petition. 3. Arguments heard. Record perused. 4. I have noticed that the learned Addl. Sessions Judge in his order dated 9.7.2005 lime-lighted the factors justifying the grant of post-arrest bail to the…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492