| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2007 SLG 1166 2007 SLD 1166 2007 MLD 1033 |
Sindh High Court
Criminal Bail Application No. 28 of 2006, decision Dated: 26-05-2006.
MUHAMMAD MUJEEBULLAH SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Jai Jai Veshnu Mange Ram
Respondent(s) by: Muhammad Ismail Bhutto
Criminal Bail Application No. 28 of 2006, decision Dated: 26-05-2006.
MUHAMMAD MUJEEBULLAH SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Jai Jai Veshnu Mange Ram
Respondent(s) by: Muhammad Ismail Bhutto
KAPTAN
VS
THE STATE
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 497
Law: Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance 1979
Section: 17(3)
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 114,148,149,302,337-H(ii)
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 337-H(ii), 114, 148 & 149---Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.17(3)---Bail, refusal of---Bail had been sought on the ground of hardship---Trial Court had reported that charge was framed and absconders had been declared proclaimed offenders---Examination -in-chief of Medical Officer was recorded, but cross-examination was reserved at the request of the counsel for accused---Plea of hardship of accused could not be considered, in circumstances---Next date of hearing had been fixed and bailable warrants had been issued---Bail application was rejected with the observation that if no further progress was made within four months and the delay was not caused on the part of defence, accused would be at liberty to repeat bail application. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: MUHAMMAD MUJEEBULLAH SIDDIQUI, J.--- Granted with all just exceptions. 2. The bail is sought on the ground of hardship. A report was…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492