Case Details

Citation(s)
2006 SLG 2975 2006 SLD 2975 2006 CLD 1592
Lahore High Court
R.F.A. No. 170 of 2003, heard on 3rd April, 2006.
SH. AZMAT SAEED AND UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JJ
Abid Aziz Sh. for Appellant. Ali Zafar Syed for
Respondents.

NAEEMULLAH MALIK

VS

. UNITED BANK LIMITED and 2 others

Law:

Section:

(a) Financial Institutions (Recovery, of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)------S.3(2)---Civil S.3(2)---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss. 13, 20 & 44-A---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art.117---Suit for recovery of Bank loan---Judgment passed by foreign Courts---Execution in Pakistan---Scope---Suit based on foreign as a cause of action and suit' based on original cause of action---Maintainability---Res judicata, principles of-:-Applicability-Plaintiff-Bank's Dubai Branch extended financial facility to defendant's company and following default in payment, the Bank filed recovery proceedings against defendants vide -a suit---Courts at Dubai decreed suit against defendants in absentia---On defendant's failure to satisfy s issued by foreign Court, the plaintiff-Bank filed recovery suit against defendants before the Banking Court in Pakistan---Banking Court decreed the suit against defendants---Defendants contended that foreign s constituted res judicata and excluded determination of original cause of action by Banking Court in Pakistan; that claim on foreign s was to be unsuccessful because statutory tests of recognition and enforceability of foreign were not applied by passed by Court in Pakistan; that claim based on original cause of action was not available because it went beyond the scope of suit which was squarely based on foreign s and that suit based on foreign cause of action three aspects namely jurisdiction over subject-matter and over the parties and territorial jurisdiction were to be taken into consideration---Plaintiff-Bank argued that a suit based on a foreign cause of action was maintainable before Courts in Pakistan under provisions of S.20, C.P.C.---Validity---On obtaining a foreign three courses were open to decree-holder, that is, he could execute decree through proceedings under S.44-A of C.P.C. without filing a suit, or, if was after fulfilling conditions of S.13, C.P.C., he could file suit on the basis of foreign keeping in view the provisions of Art.117 of Limitation Act, 1908; or he could file a suit on original cause of action as it did not come to an end after passing of foreign if same was recorded in accordance with provisions…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492