| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2005 SLG 1852 2005 SLD 1852 = 2005 PLD 157 |
Quetta High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 62 of 2005, decided on 8th July, 2005.DATE of hearing: 28th June, 2005
AKHTAR ZAMAN MALGHANI AND MEHTA KAILASH NATH KOHLI, JJ
Muhammad Aslam Chishti for Appellant. Abdul Karim Langove for the State
Criminal Appeal No. 62 of 2005, decided on 8th July, 2005.DATE of hearing: 28th June, 2005
AKHTAR ZAMAN MALGHANI AND MEHTA KAILASH NATH KOHLI, JJ
Muhammad Aslam Chishti for Appellant. Abdul Karim Langove for the State
UMEED KHANVsTHE STATE
Law: Pakistan Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302(b)/34
(a) Penal Code (XI.V of 1860)-------S. 302(b)/34---Appreciation of evidence---Fatal shot had been fired by the absconding accused with his pistol---Eye-witnesses were closely related to each other and resided at far-off places from the place of incident---Possibility of exaggeration and false implication of accused could not be ruled out---No direct role was attributed to accused in the occurrence---Prosecution had failed to prove pre-concert and common intention to commit the murder within the purview of S.34, P.P.C.---Medical evidence was in direct conflict with ocular testimony---Accused was acquitted in circumstances.Shihab Din v. State PLD 1964 SC 177; Athar Khan and 2 others v. State PLD 1972 Lah. 19; Mehrullah and 2 others v. State PLD 1999 Quetta 88; Muhammad Akbar and 2 others v. The State PLD 1991 SC 923; Mushtaq Ali and 2 others v. The State 1999 MLD 506; 2002 PCr.LJ 1072 and Bagh Ali v. Muhammnad Anwar and another 1983 SCMR 1292 ref.(b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-------S. 34---Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention---Intent and import---Joint action by a number of persons is not necessarily an action performed with a common object, but it may be performed on the spur of the moment as a reaction to some incident and such a case would fall within the ambit of S.34, P.P.C.---Mere presence of an accused at the place of incident with a co-accused who commits the offence may not be sufficient to visit the former with vicarious liability---Strong circumstances must exist manifesting a common intention---Common motive, pre-planned preparation and pre-concert are generally the elements which constitute common intention---Common intention may develop even on the spur of the moment or during the commission of offence and conversely it may undergo a change during the commission of the offence.Mehrullah and 2 others v. State PLD 1999 Quetta 88 and Muhammad Akbar and 2 others v. The State PLD 1991 SC 923 ref.(c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)------- S. 34---Common intention---Determination of---Section 34, P.P.C. declares a rule of criminal liability and does not itself create a distinct offence---In order to determine the common intention regard…