Case Details

Citation(s)
1968 SLG 193 1968 SLD 193 (1968) 70 ITR 59
Allahabad High Court
SPECIAL APPEAL No. 319 OF 1962 CONNECTED WITH SPECIAL APPEAL No. 320 OF 1962 JULY 11, 1967
V.G. OAK, C.J. AND B. DAYAL, J.

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Income Tax Officer

VS

Ram Prasad

Law:

Section:

JUDGMENT V.G. Oak, CJ.- These two special appeals arise out of proceedings under the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940. There was a Hindu undivided family known as "Ramnath Ram Prasad." Ram Prasad was the karta of the Hindu undivided family. There was a disruption of the family some time by October 1, 1951. Under a scheme of voluntary disclosure, authorities were informed about a sum of Rs. 2,08,450 as income of the Hindu undivided family. Income-tax was assessed on that income. The authorities proceeded to assess excess profits tax on the same income. Three notices were issued under section 13(1) of the Excess Profits Tax Act on February 14, 1957. Another notice under the same Act was issued on April 18, 1958, under section 15 of the same Act. Ram Prasad and others filed two writ petitions challenging the validity of the various notices issued under sections 13(1) and 15 of the Act. The two concerned writ petitions were allowed by a learned single judge of this court on December 8, 1961. The two connected special appeals by the Income-tax Officer, Gorakhpur, are directed against these orders, dated December 8,191. The main point urged for the petitioners before the learned single judge was that, in view of the fact that the Hindu undivided family disrupted as long ago as October 1, 1951, proceedings under the Excess Profits Tax Act could not be situated in 1957 or 1958. This contention has been accepted by the learned single judge. He relied upon Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax v. Jivaraj Topur and Sons [1950] 20 ITR 143 . It was held by the Madras High Court in that case that there was no provision in the Excess Profits Tax Act of assess a Hindu undivided family which had become defunct. The same view was taken by a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Neekelal Jainarain [1966] 61 ITR 704 . It was held by this court that the business of the Hindu undivided family on which notice under section 13 of the Excess Profits Tax Act had been served before the disruption of the Hindu undivided family could not be subjected to excess profits tax after the disruption of the Hindu undivided family. Mr. Gopal Behari appearing for the…
πŸ”’
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492