| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2005 SLG 1870 2005 SLD 1870 2005 PLD 4 |
Sindh High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 198 of 2003, decided on 18th December, 2003
WAHID BUX BROHI AND RAHMAT HUSSAIN, JAFFERI, JJ
Rana M. Shamim and Miss Munawar Sultana for Appellants. Mehmood Alam Rizvi, Special Prosecutor, A.N.F. for the State.
Criminal Appeal No. 198 of 2003, decided on 18th December, 2003
WAHID BUX BROHI AND RAHMAT HUSSAIN, JAFFERI, JJ
Rana M. Shamim and Miss Munawar Sultana for Appellants. Mehmood Alam Rizvi, Special Prosecutor, A.N.F. for the State.
KARL JOHN JOSEPH and another
VS
THE STATE
Law:
Section:
(a) Control of Narcotic' Substances Act (XXV of 1997)--- ---Ss. 9(c) & 25---West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), S.13(e)---Appreciation of evidence---Conviction of accused---Both prosecution witnesses were cross-examined at length, but nothing could be brought on record to contradict evidence of both witnesses---Evidence of said witnesses was uniform on all material aspects of case, except some minor discrepancies or contradictions which could occur in evidence when same was recorded after a lapse of 8/9 months---Said minor discrepancies and contradictions could be ignored easily when oral evidence furnished by prosecution witnesses was confidence-inspiring--Through said minor contradictions, no change in the prosecution story had occurred nor case of prosecution had been altered and credibility of witnesses was not affected---Investigating Officer had tried to associate two persons in the investigation, but they declined to do so---Even otherwise provisions of S.103, Cr.P.C. were applicable to search of a house or a place whereas in the present case search was made from the boat anchored at sea and S.103, Cr.P.C. was not applicable in such a situation---Provisions of S.103, Cr.P.C. were not applicable as same had specifically been excluded from their application in cases of Control of Narcotic Substances Act; 1997 by virtue of S.25 of the said Act--Provisions of Ss.20 & 21 of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 had not been violated as complainant/Investigating officer received information about availability of Narcotics in the boat after Court hours and immediately thereafter a raiding party was prepared and raid was conducted at 10-00 p.m. ---Complainant in circumstances was competent to search the boat without search warrant---Fact that samples and remaining property were sealed at the place of incident was confirmed when property lying , in the card board carton was de-sealed in the Court---No allegation was there to the effect that slabs lying in said card board were tampered with---Was immaterial as to who produced samples before Chemical Analyzer when Chemical Analyzer had received samples duly sealed and without any…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492