| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2003 SLG 3453 2003 SLD 3453 2003 PLD 340 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 1152 of 2001, decided on 26th July, 2002.
SH. RIAZ AHMED, C.J., MIAN MUHAMMAD AJMAL AND MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI, JJ
Syed Iftikhar Hussain Gilani. Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Mehr Khan Malik, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Syed Ali Hassan Gilani, Advocate Supreme Court and M.S. Khattak, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2.
Civil Petition No. 1152 of 2001, decided on 26th July, 2002.
SH. RIAZ AHMED, C.J., MIAN MUHAMMAD AJMAL AND MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI, JJ
Syed Iftikhar Hussain Gilani. Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Mehr Khan Malik, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Syed Ali Hassan Gilani, Advocate Supreme Court and M.S. Khattak, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2.
SAEED AHMAD SHAH (MASOOD AHMED SHAH) and 2 others
VS
FAWAD KHAN and 5 others
Law:
Section:
(a) North-West Frontier Province Local Government Elections Rules, 2000-- ----Rr. 18(2)(3). 71(1) & 82---North-West Frontier Province Local Government Elections Act (VI of 2000), S.14(d)---Nomination papers. acceptance of---Objection as to character and reputation of returned candidate---Same being a question of fact needed recording of evidence, which could be done by Tribunal on an election petition---Tribunal on assessment of evidence could pass appropriate order under R.82 of North West Frontier Province Local Government Elections Rules, 2000. (b) North-West Frontier Province Local Government Elections Rules, 2000-- ----Rr. 71(1) & 82---North-West Frontier Province Local Government Elections Act (VI of 2000), S.14---Objection as to acceptance of nomination papers of returned candidate being not qualified to contest election--Remedy---Election of returned candidate can be challenged before Election Tribunal by election petition by a candidate of such election---Tribunal can declare election of returned candidate to be void after being satisfied that his nomination was invalid or he was disqualified on nomination day from being elected as a member or Nazim or Naib-Nazim, as the case may be. JUDGMENT MIAN MUHAMMAD AJMAL, J.---Leave to appeal is sought against the judgment of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar . dated 19-3-2001, whereby Writ Petition No.299 of 2001 of respondents Nos. 1 and 2 was accepted, order of the District Returning Officer. Kohat dated 10-3-2001 rejecting the nomination papers of Fawad Khan, respondent on the ground that he was not enjoying good reputation, impugned therein, was set aside, the order of Returning Officer dated 1-3-2001 was restored and respondents. Nos. 3 and 4 were directed. to accept nomination papers of respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and allow them to contest the election for the office of Nazim and Naib-Nazim of Union Council Lachi (Urban). 2. Brief facts of the case are that Fawad Khan and Shaukat Ali Khan, respondents Nos. 1 and 2 submitted nomination papers before the Returning Officer for the offices of Nazim and Naib-Nazim for Union Council Lachi Urban). District Kohat which were found correct and thus accepted…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492