| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2003 SLG 841 2003 SLD 841 2003 SCMR 228 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition For. Leave to Appeal No-51 of 2002, decided on 11th September, 2002. (On appeal from judgment dated 2-11-2001 passed by the Federal service Tribunal, Islamabad, in Appeal No. 1076(R)CE of 2000)
SYED DEEDAR HUSSAIN SHAH AND TANVIR AHMED KHAN, JJ
Sadiq Muhammad Warraich, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Petitioner. Sardar Muhammad Aslam, Dy. A.G. and M.S. Khattak, Advocateai-Record for
Respondent
Civil Petition For. Leave to Appeal No-51 of 2002, decided on 11th September, 2002. (On appeal from judgment dated 2-11-2001 passed by the Federal service Tribunal, Islamabad, in Appeal No. 1076(R)CE of 2000)
SYED DEEDAR HUSSAIN SHAH AND TANVIR AHMED KHAN, JJ
Sadiq Muhammad Warraich, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Petitioner. Sardar Muhammad Aslam, Dy. A.G. and M.S. Khattak, Advocateai-Record for
Respondent
Syed NIAZ HUSSAIN SHAH BUKHARI, TECHNICIAN (PROCESS)
VS
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED through Chairman, OGDC Head Office, Islamabad
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 212(3)
(a) Civil service- ---Pay, entitlement to---When there is no work, there is in no pay. (b) Civil service- --- Salary, refund of---Civil servant after obtaining stay order against his transfer was allowed to continue his duties at. original place, where he was paid salary for about three years. ---Authority deducted from salary of civil servant the amount paid to him as salary for the period when he remained absent from duty---Service Tribunal dismissed appeal of civil servant-- Validity---Civil servant had not performed his duties either at original place or at transferred place, thus, was not entitled to salary---Period for which refund of salary was effected from civil servant was the period for which, he had not worked---When there was no work, there was no pay---Recovery had rightly been effected from civil servant---Impugned was not open to exception as there was no jurisdictional error or misconstruction of facts and law---No substantial question of law of public importance as envisaged under Art. 212(3) of the Constitution was made out---Supreme Court dismissed petition for leave to appeal in circumstances---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3). JUDGMENT SYED DEEDAR HUSSAIN SHAH, J.---Petitioner seeks leave to appeal against that judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal,, Islamabad (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) passed in Appeal No. 1076(R)CE of 2000 dated 2-11-2001, whereby appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed. 2. Briefly stated that facts of the case are that on 4-7-1994, the petitioner was transferred from Missa Kiswal to Peer Koh. He felt that transfer order so issued was mala fide and he was punished being the Union Official of the respondent/Corporation, therefore, he approached the NIRC for restraining the order under Regulation 32 of NIRC Procedure and Functions and Regulations; .1974 and a stay order against his transfer to Peer Koh was granted and he was allowed to continue and perform his duties at Missa Kiswal and also paid his salary that after about 3 years the respondent started deductions from the salary of the petitioner i.e. the amount which had been paid to him as salary, during the period he worked at Missa…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492