| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1992 SLG 626 1992 SLD 626 1992 PLC 61 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Balochistan
Labour Appeal No. 5 of 1990, decided on 5th August, 1991.
, JUSTICE AMINUL MULK MENGAL, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Labour Appeal No. 5 of 1990, decided on 5th August, 1991.
, JUSTICE AMINUL MULK MENGAL, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
ALI BAHADUR and another
VS
Law:
Section:
(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----Ss. 25-A(8)(9)(10), 35(5)(c) & 36(3)---Non-compliance of the order of Court---Complaint against---Jurisdiction---Non-compliance of any order passed by Labour Court or Tribunal, would constitute an offence and Labour E Court which had been made competent under Section 36 (3) of Ordinance to exercise all powers which were vested in Court of Magistrate of First Class, was empowered under S. 35(5)(c) of Ordinance to try that offence and not Magistrate First Class-- -Contention that Labour Court should file a complaint under S. 25-A(9) of Ordinance in Court of Magistrate of First Class for trying that offence, was devoid of any force. 1988 PLC 545; 1988 PLC 668, 1988 PLC 1005; PLJ 1986 Tribunal Cases Labour 226; 1981 PLC 663; 1982 PLC 897; 1983 PLC 1088; 1988 PLC 364 ref. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----S.25-A (8) & (9)---Order of Court---Implementation of---Where final order passed by Labour Court or Appellate Authority which was to be implemented by employer but had not been implemented by that employer workman in whose favour such order was passed was competent to file a complaint in writing before Labour Court irrespective of the fact whether any period was specified for implementation of such order or not---Specifying a certain period in the order for implementation thereof had no direct relevancy or nexus with legal competency of workman to file complaint. (c) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----S.25-A (8) & (9)---Non-compliance of order of Court---Complaint against---Where order passed by Labour Court or Tribunal was not executed within period specified in the order, workman, after lapse of specified period, could initiate proceedings by filing a complaint in writing before Labour Court---In case no period was specified in the order of Labour Court or Tribunal for implementation thereof, even then workman could file complaint in writing to Labour Court for taking action against defaulter. (d) Interpretation of Statute--- ----Harmonious interpretation---Court should try and make every attempt while interpreting different sections of a statute or…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492