Law:

Section:

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)---- ----S.O.15--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199----Constitutional jurisdiction, exercise of---Both ,Courts below on basis of evidence on record had concurrently found that no regular enquiry was held into charges against employee and that charges against employee themselves were incorrect--­Concurrent finding of Courts "below fully supported by material on record, could not be interfered with in Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court. Ghazi M.A Rashid and A.R. Arshad Malik for Petitioners. Muhammad Asghar Malik for Respondent No. 1. Nemo for Respondents Nos. 2 and 3. Date of hearing: 26th May, 1992. JUDGMENT This judgment shall dispose of W. P. No. 3361/89 and W.P. 3362/89 as common questions of law and facts arise therein. 2. Muhammad Razzaq, respondent No. 1 in W.P. 3361/89 was working as a Chowkidar while Muhammad Aslam respondent No. 1 in W.P. No.3362/89 was a Patwari in the employment of the petitioner. Their services were terminated by the petitioner on 27th July, 1989. They challenged their removal from service by fang petitions under section 25-A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, both of which were accepted by the Punjab Labour Court No. II, Lahore on 29th June, 1988 and the respondents are directed to be reinstated in service with back benefits. The petitioners were however, permitted by the Labour Court to initiate disciplinary proceedings afresh against the respondents, if they so desired. 3. The order passed by the Labour Court was challenged by the…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492