Case Details

Citation(s)
1993 SLG 1172 1993 SLD 1172 1993 PLC 138
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. KAR-362 of 1991, decided on 20th August, 1992.
AGHA ALI HYDER, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

IQBAL MUHAMMAD KHAN

VS

Law:

Section:

(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----S. 25-A---Grievance petition, maintainability of---Grievance notice admittedly was sent by employee after 2 months and 22 days from his dismissal from service and employee had not even made any application for condonation of delay in filing grievance petition---Grievance petition was rightly dismissed being patently time-barred. S.M.W. Jafri v. Muhammad Saleem Shaikh and others PLD 1979 Kar. 432 and M/s. Pakistan Machine Tools Factory v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others 1992 PLC 650; M/s. Chowdhry Brothers Ltd. v. M/s. Jaranwala Central Cooperative Bank 1968 SCMR 804 and Haji Ayoob v. Mst. Bachai and others PLD 1983 Quetta 114 and Pakistan Development Corporation v. Bank of Bahawalpur Ltd. PLD 1960 Kar. 885 ref. (b) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)---- ----S.O. 15(3)(j)---Dismissal from service on ground of misconduct---Employee was served with a charge-sheet on ground that in spite of a number of warnings he had continued producing low and less than the standard production and that his act had constituted misconduct---Reply of employee to charge-sheet having been found to be unsatisfactory, enquiry was conducted against him--Allegation of misconduct having been proved in impartial domestic enquiry against employee, employee was rightly dismissed from service especially when nothing smacked of any bias or prejudice in domestic enquiry nor there, was any breach of principles of natural justice. Ali Amjad for Appellant. Mahmood Abdul Ghani for Respondent. Date of hearing: 10th August, 1992. DECISION The circumstances in which this appeal has arisen, succinctly stated, are as under: 2. The appellant had been working with the respondents at their factory at Korangi, for a number of years. On 14-7-1981, he was served with a charge­-sheet on the ground that in spite of a number of warnings he had continued producing less than the standard, and the above act constituted misconduct under clause 15(3)(j) read with clause 15(1)(ii)(d) of the Schedule to the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968. The…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492