| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1992 SLG 691 1992 SLD 691 1992 CLC 622 |
Board of Revenue, Punjab
R.O.R. No. 1896 of 1988, decided on 10th April, 1990. DATE of hearing: 21st March, 1990
HAFEEZULAH ISHAQ MEMBER (CONSOLIDATION)
Mehmood Khan for Petitioner. Sarwar Khan Sahgel for
Respondent
R.O.R. No. 1896 of 1988, decided on 10th April, 1990. DATE of hearing: 21st March, 1990
HAFEEZULAH ISHAQ MEMBER (CONSOLIDATION)
Mehmood Khan for Petitioner. Sarwar Khan Sahgel for
Respondent
ABDUL KARIM
VS
SHEMRO
Law:
Section:
West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance (VI of 1960)--- ----S. 13---Consolidation Scheme---Petitioner was accommodated mostly according to his previous possession, but he had also received some other valuable plots which were not previously possessed by him---Petitioner's preconsolidation six plots were increased to eleven after consolidation---Petitioner had not objected to adjustment of valuable pre-consolidation area of other right holders in his scheme but had taken exception when same principle was applied to him---Petitioner after consolidation had alienated his land vide various transactions, thus taking same out from the purview of consolidation Courts during pendency of litigation---Petitioner's conduct thus, clearly debarred him 'from receiving any meaningful relief in revisional jurisdiction---Reasons given in the impugned order being cogent and unexceptionable, same were upheld. ORDER This revision petition is directed under section 13 of the consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1960, against the order dated 19-9-1988 of the Additional CommissiOne2 (Consolidation) Lahore Division, whereby he dismissed the appeal of the petitioner. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the consolidation scheme of the village Mustafabad, Tehsil and District Kasur was confirmed under lion 10(3) of the Consolidation of Holdings, 1960, by the Consolidation officer on 31-12-1979. The petitioner feeling aggrieved filed an appeal m the Court of collector (Consolidation) who vide his order dated 10-11-1985 remanded the case to the Consolidation Officer. The Consolidation Officer vide his order dated 24-5-1987 restored the Khasra Nos.2320 and 2325 to the petitioner. The respondent challenged the said order in the Court of Collector (Cons.) who vide his order dated 4-4-1988 accepted the appeal holding that the request of the respondent in appeal originally filed in hiss court was for the restoration of Khasras Nos.1357, 1358 and 1359. The petitioner assailed this order in the Court of Additional Commissioner (Cons.) vide his impugned order dismissed it holding that the pre-consolidation possession of the petitioner was established in respect of Khasras Nos.2320 and…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492