Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----S. 38---Suo motu jurisdiction of Tribunal, exercise of---Plea relating to arm­-twisting behaviour of workers by management, to have a pliant union determined as Collective Bargaining Agent in referendum, was factual in nature---Application filed on part of workers-union, being only an information laid before Tribunal would not lie as a matter of right---Tribunal refused to exercise suo motu jurisdiction vesting in it. S.P. Lodhi, Representative for Applicants. Hameed M. Siddiqui for Respondents. Date of hearing: 26th August, 1992. DECISION There has been a spate of litigation between the various unions of the workers of the Brookes Pharmaceutical Ltd., some of whom have been duly registered, and the others are awaiting registration. They have gone to all the forums available i.e. the Labour Court, this Tribunal, the Civil Courts and twice to the High Court of Sindh under the writ jurisdiction. 2. Almost an identical dispute, as the one in question, is the subject ­matter of a…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492