Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----Ss. 15(1)(i), 38(3-A) & 53---Closing down the establishment ---Suo motu revisional jurisdiction, exercise of---Establishment admittedly having undergone a considerable loss, Trial Court granted permission to employer to close down the same---After such closure all employees were terminated and had collected their dues in full---Order of Trial Court could not be interfered with by Tribunal in exercise of its suo motu revisional jurisdiction. Salim Khan for Appellant. Mehmood A. Ghani for Respondent. Date of hearing: 31st May, 1992. DECISION Given that the respondent-company engaged in the manufacture of Dry Battery' Cell has been undergoing very considerable losses from 1986 onwards; that its accumulated liabilities were more than twice the paid-up capital, but maintaining proper audited accounts for all these years which have not been seriously challenged, the question is whether the permission granted by the Labour Court to close the company and terminate the service of all his 113 or so employees can be interfered with in an Application under section 38(3-A), IRO before this Tribunal? 2.…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492