Case Details

Citation(s)
1992 SLG 1912 1992 SLD 1912 1992 KLR 120
Sindh High Court
Appeal No. 48 of 1990, 15th July, 1991
JUSTICE (RTD.) MUNAWAR ALI KHAN (CHAIRMAN) AND GHULAM MUJADID ISRAN, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Mansoor Raza Zaidi

VS

Chief Secretary And Another

Law:

Section:

Keywords: Prosecution, Dispute, Certificate, Chairman, Notice, Initial Appointment, Interference, Copy, Adequate, Satisfaction, Enquiry Officer, Mineral Development, Possession, Parties, Departmental Appeal, Adhoc Basis, Ambit, Government, Verification, Production, Claims, Constitution, Order, Director, Guilty, Removal, Management, Recruitment, Examination, Intimation, Change, Appointment, Qualification, Maintenance, Province, Competency, Penalty, Forged Document, Communication, Show-Cause Notice, Orders, Impugned Order, Invalid, Exchange, Chief Inspector, Commission, Qualifications, Notification, Care, Set Aside, Competent Authority, Public Service Commission, Fraud, Consideration, Costs, Ouster, Jurisdiction JUDGMENT JUSTICE (RTD). MUNAWARALI KHAN (CHAIRMAN).- This case arose as far back as 3rd January, 1983 when, as a result of departmental, enquiry, the services of the appellant Mansoor Raza Zaidi, holding the post of Chief Inspector of Boilers, were terminated. The appellant's ouster from service was based on the charge that for the purpose of securing employment in the Directorate of Industries, he produced a false certificate of First Class Competency purported to have been conferred by Boilers Branch, Alberta, Canada, which on verification from the said authority turned out to be only a Third Class Competency Certificate. After the Enquiry Officer (Mr. GA.H. Khan Deputy Director, Industries submitted his report, the appellant was issued final show-cause notice and was also personally heard. In the basis of the findings of the Enquiry Officer he was ultimately awarded the penalty referred to above. The appellant lost no the in questioning the correctness of the order of his termination of services in departmental appeal filed on 9.1.1983. Surprising it was after lapse of over seven years that he was intimated vide Industries and Mineral development Department's letter dated 3rd June 1990 that his appeal had been rejected by the Chief Secretary. Within 30 days of such intimation he approached this tribunal with prayer that the orders of his removal from service be set aside. 2. We heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and went through…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492