Case Details

Citation(s)
1992 SLG 737 1992 SLD 737 1992 PLC 289
Lahore High Court
Intra-Court Appeal No. 22 of 1989, decided on 27th October, 1991.
CH. FAZAL KARIM AND MUNIR. A. SHAIKH, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

HABIB BANK LIMITED EMPLOYEES! UNION, MULTAN ZONE, MULTAN

VS

THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, MULTAN REGION, MULTAN and 2 others HABIB BANK LIMITED EMPLOYEES! UNION, MULTAN ZONE, MULTAN vs THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, MULTAN REGION, MULTAN and 2 other

Law:

Section:

(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----Ss. 2(v), 2(ix) & 22---Expressions "Collective Bargaining Agent" and "Establishment"---Connotation---Trade Union in an establishment which has' been certified under S. 22, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, for that establishment would be the Collective Bargaining Agent for that establishment---Establishment was, thus, the determining factor and workers of an establishment could establish a trade union which could be certified as Collective Bargaining Agent for that establishment---Any office, firm, industrial unit, undertaking, shop or premises in which workmen are employed for carrying on any industry itself was an establishment, the only condition being that it should relate to an industry---There can, however, be more than one establishment in any industry. 1977 PLC 20; Grindlays Bank (Lloyds Branch) Employees' Union v. Registrar, Trade Union, Lahore Region, Lahore and another 1980 LLC 72 and Muhammad Aqil v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and another PLD 1978 Kar. 649 ref. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----S. 2(ix)---"Establishment"---Any office, firm, industrial unit, undertaking, shop or premises in which workmen are employed for carrying on an industry itself was an "establishment", the only condition being that it should relate to an industry. (c) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----S. 22---Collective Bargaining Agent---Trade Union in an establishment, which has been certified under S.22, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, is the Collective Bargaining Agent for that establishment. MA. Khadim for Appellant. Malik Khair Muhammad Bodla, Assistant Director Labour for Respondent No. 1. Syed Aqa Asif Jaffary for Respondent No. 2. Ch. Altaf Hussain for Respondent No. 3. Date of hearing: 28th September, 1991. JUDGMENT MUNIR A. SHAIKH, J.---This Intra-Court Appeal under section 3, of the Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972 is directed against judgment dated 23-5-1989 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 1609 of 1988 whereby the same was accepted and the Registrar, Trade Union, Multan, was directed to hold referendum to ascertain secretly the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492