Case Details

Citation(s)
1990 SLG 1046 1990 SLD 1046 1990 SCMR 1339
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 402-R of )989, decision dated: 25-03-1990.
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, C.J. AND ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY, JJ
Zafar Ali Shah, Advocate Supreme Court and Manzoor Ilahi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondents.

MUHAMMAD ANSAR and 3 others

VS

GHULAM FATIMA and 9 others

Law:

Section:

Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913)-------S. 15---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)---Petition for leave to appeal---High Court had found that plaintiff though owner of land "in" the estate was not an owner "of' the estate---Petitioners contented that material on record did not justify the finding rendered by the High Court that the land owned by the plaintiffs was not assessed to land revenue and positive evidence having not been produced by either side, it should have been presumed by High Court that the plaintiffs' land was subject to land revenue; and in the alternative that even if it be assumed that the land owned by the plaintiffs was not subject to the payment of land revenue and even if it be accepted that the trend of the authorities so far had been to the effect that a person owning such a land would not be treated as owner of the estate nevertheless all the reasoning in the old authorities which had been followed subsequently was based on the Hindu and Colonial concepts of disparity of rights amongst various classes inhabitating different estates in the rural society of the Punjab and this class distinction was the main reason for treating a person though owning a piece of land in a particular estate as not being the owner of the estate and this reasoning was no more applicable in present day Pakistan under the particular Constitutional set-up which in its ethos and character, was Islamic, hence even if the land which was owned by the plaintiff was not subject to the payment of land revenue he could not be treated as "non-owner" of the estate--­Held, contention required examination and so also to see the concept of the owner of the estate in the changed circumstances particularly after the introduction of a new set-up of Courts on the Shariat side whereunder the customary law and practices had already been done away with. ORDER MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, C J.---Leave to appeal has been sought by the successors-in-interest of a plaintiff in a suit for pre-emption; against the acceptance by the High Court, of respondents' Regular Second Appeal. The suit of the plaintiff was decreed by the trial Court. The respondents'/vendees' appeal was…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492