| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1994 SLG 1122 1994 SLD 1122 1994 KLR 123 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Misc. No. 2848-B of 1994, 18th August, 1994
: EHSAN UL HAQUE CHAUDHRY, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Criminal Misc. No. 2848-B of 1994, 18th August, 1994
: EHSAN UL HAQUE CHAUDHRY, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Khan Muhammad
VS
The State
Law:
Section:
Keywords: Abduction, Enforcement, F.I.R, Parties, Delay, Rape, Consideration, Petition, Petitioner, Order, Surety, Registered, Trial Court, Satisfaction, Notice, Enforcement Of Hudood, Bail After Arrest ORDER EHSAN UL HAQ CHAUDHRY, J.- The petitioner has applied for bail after arrest in case FIR No.166 under section 10/16 of Offence of Zina(Enforcement of Hadood) Ordinance 7 of 1979 registered with P.S. City Sargodha on the application of Allah Bukhsh complainant. The notice was issued to the State which is represented by Mr. Muhammad Naeem, Advocate. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner in support of the petition argued that it is clearly a case of elopement and not abduction. It is added that the alleged abductee was recovered from the house of Tariq accused. It is argued that there is a delay of four days in registering the case and the petitioner has been ropped on mere suspection. The arguments are summed up with the submission that in any case it is a case of further inquiry. 3. On the other hand, the learned State Counsel argued that…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492