Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-- ---S.25-A---Employees claiming to be workmen had filed joint grievance: petition against termination of their services---Only one of the employees was examined before Court and no other employee d filed any affidavit in evidence---Only employee examined in case, subsequently had withdrawn from proceedings and grievance petition filed by him was dismissed as withdrawn by Court and evidence given by him was kept out of consideration by Court while deciding case and no other evidence was left on record as no other employee had examined himself or produced any evidence---Employer had denied assertion of employees that they were their workmen---No appointment order of employees having been produced before Court, grievance petition was rightly dismissed by Court as employees had failed to prove their employment with employer. Nizam Bukhari for Appellants. Date of hearing: 4th September, 1091. DECISION This is an appeal against the order passed, by the learned Presiding Officer of Sindh Labour Court No. 1 on 4-7-1991 dismissing the grievance petition of the appellants. 2. I have heard Mr. Nizam Bukhari for the appellants. The brief facts a that the appellants claim to be workmen working in the respondent establishment, who allegedly orally terminated the service of the appellants on 15-5-1.989. After serving grievance notices upon the respondent, the appellants filed joint grievance petition before Labour Court. In the joint grievance petition before the Labour Court the impugned order of the learned Labour Court discloses, that only appellant Abdul Ghaffar was examined before him and no other appellant filed…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492