| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1990 SLG 1099 1990 SLD 1099 1990 SCMR 1446 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos.644, 683 and 0184 of 1986, decision dated: 25-07-1989.
SHAFIUR RAHMAN AND SAAD SAOOD, JAN, JJ
Muhammad Akhtar Additional Advocate-General Punjab and Abdus Samad Hashmi, Advocate Supreme Court and Rao Muhammad Yousaf Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners (in all the three petitions). M.A. Zafar, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) and Ch. Muhammad
Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos.644, 683 and 0184 of 1986, decision dated: 25-07-1989.
SHAFIUR RAHMAN AND SAAD SAOOD, JAN, JJ
Muhammad Akhtar Additional Advocate-General Punjab and Abdus Samad Hashmi, Advocate Supreme Court and Rao Muhammad Yousaf Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners (in all the three petitions). M.A. Zafar, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) and Ch. Muhammad
THE DIRECTOR, FOOD, PUNJAB and 2 others
VS
RASHID AHMAD, FOODGRAINS SUPERVISOR DEPUTYDIRECTOR FOOD and anothers vs GHULAMSARWAR --Respondent DEPUTYDIRECTOR FOOD and anothers vs MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM DASTI
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)-------Art. 212(3)---Order of recovery of losses, allegedly caused due to neglect of employee passed by competent Authority was set aside by Service Tribunal--Decision of Service Tribunal was based substantially on merits of case as revealed from authentic report of Authorised officer prepared by him after taking into consideration all circumstances and prevailing conditions---Such an order could not be interfered with by Supreme Court especially when no question of law requiring further examination of case was involved. JUDGMENT SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.---The petitioners, the Director/Deputy-Director Food, have by three separate Petitions sought leave to appeal against the judgment of the Service Tribunal whereby the orders of recovery of loss in the storage of wheat caused apparently due to the neglect of the respondents/officials were set aside by the Service Tribunal. 2. Shortage in the storage of procured wheat was detected by the Government whereupon inquiries were held against the functionaries. The storage conditions were defective of which the complaints had been made time and again by these officers and keeping this in view the Authorised Officer recommended that loss to a reasonable extent be written off, as for substantial damage the concerned officers were not responsible. The competent authority, however, enhanced the penalty leviable. The Service Tribunal after examining merits of the case on the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492