Case Details

Citation(s)
1990 SLG 500 1990 SLD 500 1990 SCMR 227
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1-R of 1989, decision dated: 25-06-1989.
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH AND USMAN ALI SHAH, JJ
Muhammad Munir Paracha, Advocate Supreme Court and Manzoor Illahi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondents.

MUHAMMAD RASHID and 2 others

VS

THE STATE and others--Respondents

Law:

Section:

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-----S. 514-A---Surety bond---Word (1)---Connotation: -Words and phrases]. The word when translated into English means severally. And if so construed each surety would be separately responsible for the forfeiture and the payment of the surety amount independently of the other surety's liability. They will also be jointly liable for the amount. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-- ---S. 514-A---Surety bond, forfeiture of---High Court gave benefit to sureties by reducing surety amount from Rs. 50,000 each to Rs. 40,000 each---Beyond this concession, in case of "Dildar and another v. The State PLD 1963 SC 47" was of no help to sureties---Petition for leave to appeal dismissed in circumstances. Dildar and another v. The State PLD 1963 SC 47 ref. ORDER MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sought by the sureties for the appearance of the accused in a case of Narcotics against the dismissal of their Revision by the High Court regarding forfeiture and recovery of the surety amount, which however was reduced from Rs. 50,000 each to Rs.40,000 each. Learned counsel has taken us through the bail-surety bonds and has argued…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492