| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1992 SLG 2201 1992 SLD 2201 1992 PLJ 174 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos. 976-L of 1991, 5-L and 6-L of 1992, converted into appeals and accepted on 2.3.1992. [On appeal from orders of Lahore High Court, Dated 16.10.1991, 24.11.1991 and 27.11.1991, passed in W.P. Nos. 8153, 7049 and 653
SHAFIUR RAHMAN AND RUSTAM S.SLDHWA, JJ
Ch. Ijaz Ahmad, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Mr. Tanvir Ahmad, AOR for Petitioners (in all Petitions).
Respondents: Not represented (in C.P. 976-L of 1991). Mr. S.M. Masud, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Sh. Masud Akhtar, AOR for Respo
Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos. 976-L of 1991, 5-L and 6-L of 1992, converted into appeals and accepted on 2.3.1992. [On appeal from orders of Lahore High Court, Dated 16.10.1991, 24.11.1991 and 27.11.1991, passed in W.P. Nos. 8153, 7049 and 653
SHAFIUR RAHMAN AND RUSTAM S.SLDHWA, JJ
Ch. Ijaz Ahmad, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Mr. Tanvir Ahmad, AOR for Petitioners (in all Petitions).
Respondents: Not represented (in C.P. 976-L of 1991). Mr. S.M. Masud, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Sh. Masud Akhtar, AOR for Respo
BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE & SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE, and anothers/--Appellants
VS
Mst. SALMA AFROZE--Respondent
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 15(3)
Law: Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972
Section: 3
(i) Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- —-Art. 185(3) read with Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972, Section 3-Intermediate examination-Papers of~Re-evaluation of answer books-Orders of-Challenge to-Preliminary objection that Intra Court Appeal being competent, petitions do not lie before Supreme Court-Under Law Reforms Ordinance, no Intra Court appeal lies against an interim order—Held: Subject matter of these petitions being by and large interim orders, petitions under Article 185(3) of Constitution by leave of Court, are competent [P.179]AB (ii) Re-evaluation- —Intermediate examination-Papers of~Re-evaluation of answer books-¬Orders of~Challenge to~There was no ex-fade disclosure of criminality, irresponsibility or fraud and abuse of regulations in marking papers of respondents in these petitions—Perversity, abuse and criminality in evaluating papers should be particularised before Chairman as well as before Court and person/examiner accused of having indulged, should be impleaded as a party in Court and allowed to meet allegations-Held: If decision annulling earlier evaluation by examiner, is given, said examiner should stand disqualified for ever from handling answer books/papers of every examination conducted by Board-Held further: Re-evaluation done under interim orders of High Court, shall stand revoked and if respondents want to continue with writ petitions, they shall make fuller disclosure, implead examiners and raise appropriate oleas in matter-Petitions converted into appeals and accepted. [Pp.l82183]C,DE PLD 1969 SC 278 and PLD 1975 SC 331 ref. JUDGMENT Shafiur Rahman, J.--Two of three…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492