Case Details

Citation(s)
1991 SLG 1596 1991 SLD 1596 1991 PLC 621
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Appeal No. 190/813 of 1988, decision dated: 21st October, 1990.
ABDUL HAMID KHAN, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

YAQEENUDDIN MALIK

VS

DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB and others

Law:

Section:

Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975--- ----R. 4---Reduction in time-scale ---Misconduct---Apellant, while posted as Food grains Inspector committed certain irregularities in purchasing wheat from and supplying bags to sellers---Appellant, after completing formalities, was imposed penalty of reducing time-scale by one stage---Appeal of appellant was rejected by departmental Appellate Authority---Record showed that appellant had been discriminated against and treated rather harshly while another Food grains Inspector in similar circumstances was treated differently though allegations against said other official were similar in nature---Appellant had not been discreet in pursuit of his main objective i.e. procurement of wheat and in that process he had overlooked certain instructions of Government---Mitigating circumstances such as the fact that others in the department were also committing same mistakes and some allowance had also to be given on account of fact that appellant was careful enough to ensure that no loss was caused to Government also existed---Order passed against appellant was set aside in circumstances. Muhammad Yasin Bhatti for Appellant. Manzoor Hussain, District Attorney for Respondents. Date of hearing: 12th August, 1990. JUDGMENT The appellant, Y.D. Malik, while posted as Food grains Inspector at PR Centre Bedian, District Kasur during Wheat Scheme 1986-87, was proceeded against departmentally and charge-sheeted as under: "(i) That while posted at Bedian you purchased and despatched wheat to Lahore wherein a shortage of 400 kgs was detected which you deducted from the bill of the seller out of his Bill No. 12. (ii) That amount of Bardana has been deducted from Bill No. 7 at Rs. 8 per bag whereas in some cases the same was deducted at Rs.10 per bag. (iii) Although Bills Nos. 11 and 12 had been prepared yet the same were not delivered to the sellers for want of acknowledgements from the recipient centre. (iv) Bardana was being issued without stencilling. (v) Amount of security of bardana was deducted from the bills of the wheat. (vi) That 2,100 bags were issued to one Abdul Rasheed against the security of 200 bags.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492