| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1997 SLG 482 1997 SLD 482 1997 PLD 605 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 3 in Ehtesab Reference No. 19 of 1997, decided on 7th May, 1997.
MIAN ALLAH NAWAZ . AND MUHAMMAD ISLAM BHATTI, JJ
Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad Khan with Rizwan Mushtaq for Applicant. Sher Zaman Khan, Special Prosecutor with Raja Saleem Akthar for the State
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 3 in Ehtesab Reference No. 19 of 1997, decided on 7th May, 1997.
MIAN ALLAH NAWAZ . AND MUHAMMAD ISLAM BHATTI, JJ
Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad Khan with Rizwan Mushtaq for Applicant. Sher Zaman Khan, Special Prosecutor with Raja Saleem Akthar for the State
THE STATE--Applicant
VS
MUHAMMAD HASHAM BABAR
Law:
Section:
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497/498---Cash security in bail---Rule is that the Court while dealing with application under S.497/498, Cr.P.C. has no power to insist upon deposit of cash security in connection with the bail. Lakhi Narayan kundu v. The Crown PLD 1955 Dacca 84; Abdul Ahad v. The State 1970 PCr.LJ 1256; Muhammad Riaz v. The State 1979 PCr.LJ 427 and Mst. Sher Bano and another v. The State PLD 1989 Kar. 602 ref. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 497/498 & 513/514---Ehtesab Ordinance (XX of 1997), S.3---Power of Court to ask for cash security---Form of securities enjoined under S.513/514, Cr.P.C. is not applicable in the new dispensation and Court has inherent jurisdiction to evolve its own procedure for securities. Lakhi Narayan Kundu v. The Crown PLD 1955 Dacca 84; Abdul Ahad v. The State 1970 PCr.LJ 1256; Muhammad Riaz v. The State 1979 PCr.LJ 427; Mst. Sher Bano and another v. The State PLD 1989 Kar. 602; Amir Sardar v. The State 1990 PCr.LJ 414; Black's Law Dictionary, 5th End., p.127; Illinois's Laws of Bail; Schilb v. Kuebel (1971), 404 US 357, 92 SCT 479, 30L. Ed. 2d. 502; Manning v. State 190 Okla 65; Re: Wright 228 NC 584 SE 2d 696; State v. Langford 223 SC 20 73, SE 2d 854; Bottom v. People 63 Code 114, 164, p.697; Isbell v. Bay County Circuit Judge, 215 Mich 364, 183 NW 721, 16 ALR 971; Scarboro v. State 207 Ga 449, 62 SE 2d 168; Wilson v. Justice's Court of San Diego Twp.22 Cal. App. 2d 278, 70 P2d 695; ,Snyder v.Gross 69 Neb 340, 95 NW 636; Campbell v. Reno County, 97 Kan. 68 164 p.257: Re. Henderson, 27 ND 155, 145 NW 574; Ahsmuhs v. Bowyer, 39 Okla 376, 135 P.413; Young v. Stoutamire, 131 Fla 535 m 179 So 797; Clerks of Court as CustodiaAs of cash bail, see Clerks of Courts (1st 3d Sec:15); M/s. Aisha Spinning Mills Ltd. v. Fedration of Pakistan 1995 PTD 493 and Az4 A. Sheikh v. Commissioner of I.T.I. PLD 1989 SC 613 ref. (c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 497 & 561-A---Ehtesab Ordinance (XX of 1997), S.3---Review of order admitting the accused to bail subject to deposit of cash security---Power of Court to ask for cash security in the context of Ehtesab Ordinance---Court…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492