| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1991 SLG 2199 1991 SLD 2199 1991 KLR 128 |
Lahore High Court
Appeal No. 616 of 1990, 9th March, 1991
MUHAMMAD MAHMUD ASLAM PIRZADA, CHAIRMAN
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No. 616 of 1990, 9th March, 1991
MUHAMMAD MAHMUD ASLAM PIRZADA, CHAIRMAN
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Muhawar Alam Leghari Inspector Police
VS
I.G. Of Police Punjab, Lahore And 2 Other
Law:
Section:
Keywords: Costs, Stolen Property, Cogent Reasons, Property, Set Aside, Departmental Appeal, Parties, Registered, Recovery, Intervention, Expunction, Register, Period, Promotion, Consideration, Proceedings, Retention, Place, Chairman, Malice, Order, Guilty, Confidential JUDGMENT MOHAMMAD MAHMUD ASLAM PIRZADA, CHAIRMAN.- Munawar Ahmed Leghari, Inspector of Police, has filed this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974 in which he has impleaded the I.G. Of Police, Punjab, Lahore, D.I.G, of Police, Bahawalpur Range, and Foyyaz Ahmed Mir formerly Superintendent of Police Bahawalpur as respondents. Through this appeal the appellant has prayed that the impugned adverse remarks pertaining to the period from 1.1.1987 to 14.9.87 conveyed to him be expunged and the order dated 2.6.90 whereby the representation of the appellant was dismissed be set aside. 2. Brief facts of this case are that the appellant was communicated the following adverse remarks in his Confidential report mentioned above: ((Table Start))1. Devtion to duty. 2. Drill and discipline. 3. Behaviours with public 4. Integrity 5. Performance and crime control officer 6 In detection of cases traced. 7. Recovery of stolen property. 8. Rating as an SHO if so appointed. 9. Fitness for retention after 25 years. 10. Fitness for promotion 11. Class of report Below average. Below average Below average 'D' (Poor) Below average Poor Poor Poor Unfit Unfit((Table End)) 12. GENERAL REMARKS. A discredit to the Department. No frequently was found guilty of burking, was reputed to be very corrupt and was totally indiscipline. There was a strike against his misbehaviour and misdeeds. Not for SHO posting. The appellant filed a representation before respondent No.1 which was rejected on 2.6.90. Hence this appeal. 3. I have heard the parties at length with the assistance of the departmental representatives. 4. The main contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the adverse remarks conveyed to the appellant for the period commencing from 1.1.87 to 14.9.87 are out of malice and without justification. Conversely the learned District Attorney has seriously opposed the appeal and submitted…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492