Law:

Section:

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)-------Art.185(3)---Concurrent finding of fact by three Courts below---Leave to appeal---Trial Court on the basis of evidence on record had come to conclusion that petitioner had encroached on an area of the house transferred to respondents' predecessor-in-interest---Finding was upheld in appeal on re­appraisal of evidence---Such finding having not been shown to be suffering from any misreading of evidence was not displaced in revision, by High Court--­Concurrent finding of fact by three Courts below called for no interference by Supreme Court---No point of law was involved---Leave to appeal refused. ORDER ABDUL SHAKURUL SALAM, J.--Respondents are heirs of Muhammad Raman who was transferred a House No. P-521, situate in Toba Tek Singh. Adjacent property No. 522/2, was transferred to one - Fateh Muhammad who sold it to Abdul Ghani and the later in his turn sold it to the petitioners. The respondents filed a civil suit saying that the petitioners had encroached an area measuring 2-1/2 Marlas of the House No. P-521 transferred to their predecessor, Muhammad Ramzan and for recovery of the said area. It was resisted by the petitioners. On the basis of the evidence on the record, the learned Civil .fudge, Toba Tek Singh came to the conclusion that the claim of the respondent was correct and he decreed the suit vide judgment and decree dated 9-3-1985. On petitioners' appeal. the evidence was re-appraised by the learned Additional District .judge, Toba Tek Singh, who upheld the finding of the learned trial Court and dismissed the appeal vide judgment…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492