| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1990 SLG 407 1990 SLD 407 1990 PLD 972 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeals Nos.211 to 216 of 1986, decision dated: 21st June, 1990. dates of hearing: 10th and 12-04-1990
SHAFIUR RAHMAN AND ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Appeals Nos.211 to 216 of 1986, decision dated: 21st June, 1990. dates of hearing: 10th and 12-04-1990
SHAFIUR RAHMAN AND ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
AMIR ABDULLAH KHAN through Legal Heirs and others
VS
Col. MUHAMMAD ATTAULLAH KHAN
Law: Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913
Section: 15
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 185(3)
(a) Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913)-----S. 15---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)---Leave to appeal was granted to examine whether any portion of the property sold by registered sale-deed was left out of the suit for pre-emption, so as to reduce or adversely affect the entitlement of the appellants. (b) Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913)-- ---S. 15---Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 [M.L.R.64]---Pre-emption suit--Controversy related to the period prior to the enforcement of the Martial Law Regulation No.64---If the pre-emption decree was co-extensive with that of the sale-deed then the plaintiffs were entitled to succeed leaving the Martial Law Regulation to take its own course on their rights after its enforcement. (c) Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913)-- ---S. 15---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)---Pre-emption suit--Respondent contested suit wherein the pre-emptor claimed a superior right of pre-emption on the ground of being both Ala Malik and Adna Malik in the estate and claimed that the vendee was an utter stranger---Ground which respondent was invoking before the Supreme Court and all the Courts had upheld would imply that pre-emption suit was bad for partial pre-emption as the entire property was not being sought to be pre-empted though price for the entire property was being paid under the decree---Held, a ground which was available to the respondent for defeating the pre-emption claim and was not utilized and invoked could not now be made a ground for defeating the claim of the successful preemptor as against him and such ground having not been pleaded at any stage it could not be made the basis of decision. (d) Interpretation of documents-- --- Construction of a foundation or title document and also the legal effect of such document are not questions of fact but are pure question of law. (e) Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913)-- ---S. 15---Pre-emption suit ---Pre-emption claim sought to be enforced was made by reference to the registered sale-deed---Registered sale-deed included both the Aala Malik as well as the Adna Malkiat---Such a reference to the registered sale-deed had the effect of incorporating the whole of the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492