Law:

Section:

Keywords: Division, Punishment, Guilty, Order, Period, Sub-Division, Records, Expunction, Consideration, Costs, Misuse Of Authority, Objections, Contentions, Parties, Orders, Evidence, Maintain, Plea, Chairman, Set Aside, Impugned Order, Care JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD MAHMUD ASLAM PIRZADA, CHAIRMAN.- Jehan Khan DSP has filed this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974. In which he has impleaded the Superintendent of Police, Bahawalnagar, I.G. Of Police. Punjab, Lahore and DIG of Police, Bahawalpur as respondents. Through this appeal the appellant has prayed that the impugned adverse remarks conveyed to him vide letter dated 27.12.1987 be expunged and order dated 2.10.1988 passed by respondent No.2 rejecting his representation be set aside. 2. Brief facts of this case are that the appellant was communicated the following adverse remarks in his ACR for the period from 8.2.1986 to 31.12.1986: ((Table))PART - III 12. Behaviour with public B low average. PART - V (a) Pen picture: A number of people made complaints of Corruption against him from Minchinabad ' Sub-Division. PART - VI (c) interrity Reported to be corrupt ((Table End)) The appellant filed a representation before respondent No.2 which was rejected vide. His order dated 2.10.1988. Hence this appeal. 3. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned District Attorney at length and perused the service record of the appellant with care. 4. The main contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that adverse remarks conveyed to the appellant are malafide and that the appellant has been exonerated of the charges levelled against him. The learned Distt. Attorney strongly contested and opposed the plea so taken by the learned counsel for the appellant and submitted that the adverse remarks under appeal in the light of the written objections filed on behalf of respondents be allowed to stand on the ACR of the appellant. 5. We have given our anxious consideration to the arguments advanced by the parties and also examined the service record of the appellant and written objections filed by the respondents minutely and find that the appellants counsel has failed to…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492