Law:

Section:

Civil service--- ---- Annual Confidential Report---Adverse remarks---Expunction of---Appellant, an Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police contended that impugned Confidential Report was initiated by Deputy Superintendent of Police whereas the authority for that purpose was Superintendent of Police; that incident which had been made basis of Confidential Report occurred outside period of report and that impugned report was based on an incident/inquiry in which appellant had already been exonerated by Appellate Authority/Deputy Inspector-General of Police--- District Attorney was unable to controvert the contentions---Adverse remarks were ordered to be expunged. MA. Riaz and Ch. Manzoor Hussain, DA. for Appellant. Nemo for Respondents. ORDER Arguments heard. The learned counsel for the appellant has raised the following basic legal and factual objections:-- (i) Under Serial No. 21 of the Schedule to the I G.P's Standing Order No. 32 the authority for purposes of initiating the Confidential Reports in respect of the A.S.Is. is Superintendent of Police and not the D.S.P. Hence the remarks recorded by the then D.S.P., Naulakha, Lahore in the impugned Confidential Report are invalid being…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492