Case Details

Citation(s)
1992 SLG 2126 1992 SLD 2126 1992 PLJ 324
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No.1486 of 1992, accepted on 18.5.1992   Date of hearing: 18.5.1992.
MUHAMMAD QAYYUM, J
Mr. Noor Muhammad Sheikh, Advocate for Petitioner. Rana Muhammad Arshad, Addl. A.G. for
Respondents.

NASEEM RIAZer

VS

CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, LAHORE and 2 others--Respondents

Law:

Section:

Educational Institutions-- —-Examination for Diploma of Associate Engineers-Refusal to declare result of petitioner-Challenge to-According to rules, petitioner could not have sent his admission form nor deposited examination fee directly with respondent No.1--Only obligation cast upon petitioner was that he should have submitted his admission form and deposited examination fee with institution wherein he was studying—Both these conditions were fully met with—Held: Petitioner cannot be made to suffer for any lapse on part of institution-Petition accepted.                                                                              [P.326]A,BC JUDGMENT Naseem Riaz, petitioner herein, is a student of Government College of Technology, Samanabad, Faisalabad. By the Notification dated 4.9.1991, the annual examination for Diploma of Associate Engineers, 1991 was scheduled to be held with effect from 26th September, 1991. The last date for submission of admission form and payment of examination fee alongwith late fee was fixed as 15th September, 1991. The candidates were required to send their forms through the institutions where they were studying. 2. The petitioner submiltcd his admission form to the Principal Government College of Technology, Samanabad, Faisalabad and also deposited the requisite examination fee well within time. However, as he did not receive the roll number, he made a representation on which he was permitted by Principal to take the examination. As the result of the petitioner was not being announced, he has come to this Court by filing this constitutional petition for issuance of a direction to the respondents to declare his result. 3. The petition has been resisted by respondents Nos. 1 and 2 who have stated in their report and para-wise comments that as the admission form of the petitioner was not received from the Principal before 15th September, 1991, the last date fixed for submission of forms, the petitioner could not have appeared in the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492