Law:

Section:

(a) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)--- ----S.O.15--Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), S.25-A--Termination of service--Misconduct--Respondent employee, at time of his employment with employer, concealed fact that he was already employed somewhere else--­Services of worker were terminated by employer as a result of finding arrived at in domestic inquiry---Fact that respondent was in service somewhere else and he did not disclose same to appellant employer while seeking employment with him not denied--Rules framed by Employer forbidding double employment were not repugnant to Standing Orders Ordinance and could be enforced---Order of dismissal of worker on ground that he had engaged himself in double; employment was upheld. District Manager K.R.T.C. v. Rasheedullah 1987 P L C 206 dist. (b) Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act (LIII of 1952)--- ----S.5---West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S.O.15(4)---Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), S.25-A---Charge-sheet---Contention of employer that employee was charge-sheeted under S.5 of Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952 and not for misconduct under Standing Orders Ordinance--Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968 did not provide for framing of any formal charge-sheet but only requirement of Standing Order 15(4) was that act of misconduct should be brought to notice of accused person--Held mere mention of S.5 of Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952 in charge-sheet would not invalidate charge-sheet which clearly mentioned act of misconduct. Gul Muhammad Soomro, Representative for Appellant. S.P. Lodhi, Representative for Respondent. Date of hearing: 15th April, 1990. DECISION This is an appeal against the order of learned Presiding Officer, Sindh Labour Court No.VI at Karachi, dated 30-9-1989, whereby the grievance petition of the respondent was allowed and he was ordered to be reinstated in service without back benefits. 2. The brief facts of the case appear to be, that the respondent was employed by the appellants on 6-7-1983. At the time of his…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492