| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1991 SLG 1847 1991 SLD 1847 1991 PLC 114 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. 239 of 1989, decided on 10th April, 1990.
AHMED ALI U. QURESHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Muhammad Rashid Khan for Appellant. H.A.Jafri for
Respondents.
Appeal No. 239 of 1989, decided on 10th April, 1990.
AHMED ALI U. QURESHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Muhammad Rashid Khan for Appellant. H.A.Jafri for
Respondents.
KHALIL AHMAD
VS
Messrs PAKISTAN STEEL FABRICATION CO LTD. KHALIL AHMAD vs Messrs PAKISTAN STEEL FABRICATION CO LTD.
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ---S.25-A--Termination of service--Temporary worker--Worker's services were terminated by employer on ground that he was a temporary employee--Worker had been appointed as a loader by employer for certain period but in each case less than three months--Evidence produced by employer showing that there was break of service between termination of earlier appointment and subsequent appointment of worker each time--Employer's evidence going unchallenged, worker admitted that he was appointed temporarily from time to time as per his appointment letters which all bore his signatures and had been produced by him-- ;f' No evidence was produced to show that at any time worker had worked for more than three months continuously as loader--Held, worker had not acquired right as a permanent workman--Order of Labour Court dismissing grievance petition of worker against order of his termination from service was upheld. 1967 L L C 432 and 1986 P L C 402 ref. Date of hearing: 10th April, 1990. DECISION This is an appeal against the order of the learned Presiding Officer, First Sindh Labour Court at Karachi, dated 1-3-1989, whereby the grievance petition of the appellant was dismissed. 2. The case of the appellant is that he was working as Loader in the respondent's factory since, 1985 but his services were terminated on 5-3-1987. Aggrieved by this termination of service he served grievance notice and thereafter he filed grievance petition before the learned Labour Court, which was resisted by the respondents on the ground that the appellant was appointed as a temporary workman from time to time a., the nature of job was temporary and therefore, his services were terminated after his services were no more required, 3. I have heard Mr. Muhammad Rashid Khan, learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. H.A. Jafri, the learned Advocate for the respondents and have also gone through the record and proceedings of the case. 4. The evidence on record show that the appellant was appointed through various appointment letters dated 19-5-1985, 19-8-1985, 8-12-1985, 9-3-1986, 24-6-1986, 16-10-1986 and 21-12-1986 for certain period mentioned in…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492