Case Details

Citation(s)
1991 SLG 2237 1991 SLD 2237 1991 KLR 318
Lahore High Court
Appeals No. 626, 627, 666 and 667 of 1989, Ist October, 1991
MUHAMMAD MEHMUD ASLAM PIRZADA, CHAIRMAN AND ABDUL HAMED, KHAN, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Rashid Ahmad

VS

Superintendent Of Police Rahim Yar Khan And 2 Other

Law:

Section:

Keywords: Examination, Show Cause Notice, Evidence, Orders, Chairman, Removal, Penalty, Order, Receipt, Parties, Illegal, Promotion, Copies, Impugned Order, Opportunity Of Hearing, Notice, Set Aside, Disposed Of, Care, Procedure, Restoration, Costs, Removal, Office JUDGMENT MOHAMMAD MEHMUD ASLAM PIRZADA, CHAIRMAN.- M/S Rashid Ahmad, Hafiz Ullah, Asif Mehmood and Mohammad Aslam, Constables of the office of Superintendent of Police, Rahim Yar Khan have filed four appeals bearing Nos.627/89,667/89, 666/89 and 626/89 respectively under Section 4 of Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974 against the impugned orders dated 24.9.1989 and 30- 10-1989 passed by the respondents. The appellants have impleaded Superintendent of Police, Rahim Yar Khan, Deputy Inspector General of Police, Bahawalpur Range Bahawalpur and Inspector General of Police, Punjab, Lahore as respondents. Through these appeals, appellants have prayed that impugned orders passed by the respondents be set aside and respondents be directed to restore the appellants results dated 16.4.1988 and restore their names to promotion list B-I. 2. Since all the four appeals contained identical facts as well as law points, therefore, these are disposed of by our this single judgment. 3. Brief facts of these appeals are that appellants joined Police Force as Constables. They were confirmed and were brought on list 'A'. The examination for promotion to list B-I was held in District Rahim Yar Khan on 16.4.1988. The appellants appeared in the said examination alongwith the other constables. After he said examination, 31 constables including the appellants were declared successful. On the basis of said result, appellants were duly admitted to list B-I. After the announcement of the result, a complaint was received by the higher authority alleging that the examiner had shown leniency and given inflated remarks to some candidates. On receipt of directions from the Deputy Inspector General of Police, rechecking of papers was conducted by the then Superintendent of Police. On reconciliation of merit position, it was assessed that 9 constables had been shown leniency and given inflated remarks by the examiner for their admission…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492