| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1991 SLG 1863 1991 SLD 1863 1991 PLC 147 |
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Appeal No. 936/784 of 1987, decided on 7th April, 1990.
MUHAMMAD MEHMUD ASLAM PIRZADA, CHAIRMAN AND ABDUL HAMID KHAN, MEMBER
Zia-ul-Hassan for Appellant. A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for
Respondents.
Appeal No. 936/784 of 1987, decided on 7th April, 1990.
MUHAMMAD MEHMUD ASLAM PIRZADA, CHAIRMAN AND ABDUL HAMID KHAN, MEMBER
Zia-ul-Hassan for Appellant. A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for
Respondents.
Syed ZAMAN SHAH
VS
SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE and another Syed ZAMAN SHAH vs SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE and another
Law:
Section:
(a) Civil service-- ----Annual Confidential Report---Instructions for Writing Confidential Reports, Instruction No. 27---Expunction of adverse remarks---Appellant, Sub-Inspector of Police, was awarded in his report for 1986 entry i.e. "Integrity---Controversial, a sheer mediocre who developed reputation for corruption, his conduct is under inquiry on charge of corruption"---While rejecting his representation, Countersigning Officer made an observation that "reportedly his conduct on charge of corruption is under inquiry which is still to be finalised"---No inquiry in fact was pending against appellant on charge of corruption and reference to inquiry conducted against him was misplaced and wholly irrelevant---Inquiry was ordered against appellant on charge of misconduct but he was exonerated of charge by Reporting Officer---Said inquiry had no bearing on his Annual Confidential Report---No inquiry on charge of `corruption' was conducted and mention thereof in Annual Confidential Report was wholly mis-statement and factually incorrect---Annual Confidential Report related to year 1986 and report was initiated on 24-2-1987 i.e. much after deletion of Instruction No. 27 which required mention of fact of inquiry in Annual Confidential Report---Mention of an unfinished inquiry in A.C.R. for 1986, therefore, was superfluous---Appeal was accepted to the extent that remarks about corruption in report for 1986 would stand expunged. (b) Civil service---- ---Instructions about Confidential Report, Instruction No. 27---Annual Confidential Report---Inquiry---If an inquiry was pending and had not been finalised, mention of same need not be made in Annual Confidential Report. Date of hearing: 28th March, 1990. JUDGMENT ABDUL HAMID KHAN (MEMBER).---Syed Zaman Shah, Sub-Inspector, District Police Lines, Rawalpindi has filed this appeal wherein he has prayed that the order dated 24-11-1987 of respondent No.2/DIG, Rawalpindi Range rejecting the official's representation against the adverse remarks contained in his ACR for the year 1986 be set aside and he may be granted the consequential relief and back benefits. 2. In the appellant's ACR for the year 1986, the reporting officer…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492