Law:

Section:

Keywords: Satisfaction, Possession, Violation Of Article, Inter Se, Petition, Petitioner, Prohibition, Prima Facie, Magistrate, Registered, Violation, Recovery, Order, Investigation, Holders, Enforcement, Prejudice, Grievance, Ulterior Motive, Contentions ORDER TANVIR AHMAD KHAN, J. The petitioners, both father and son inter se, have approached this Court for post arrest bail in a case registered against them vide FIR NO.178 dated 23.6.1990 under Articles 3 and 4 of Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979, at Police Station City Gojra. 2. The allegations against the petitioners that after the registration of case FIR No.176, facts of which have been given in Cr. Misc. No.3449/B-90, the raiding party reached the petitioners shop and apprehended both the petitioners. Rs.610.00 from the possession of petitioner No.1 while Rs.3000/- were recovered from petitioner No.2. 80 bottles of liquor each weighing 12 ounce were also recovered at the Plantation of petitioner No.2 from an Almirah in the shop. 3. Bail has been sought on the ground that the petitioner Aziz-ud-Din is a qualified dispenser and is running a Chemist and Druggist shop for the last many years under the licence issued by the Licensing Authority, Toba Tek Singh, under the Drugs Act 1976 and the Rules made thereunder. Learned counsel has stated that the incriminating material, according to the Chemical Examiner's reports, was tincture aurantia which is a substandard medicinal preparation. Learned counsel has placed on record a cash memo and a permit of transportation of the alleged incriminating material to the shop both dated 21.6.1990. It is argued by the learned counsel that the petitioners have been involved in this case out of ulterior motive to pressurize petitioner No.1 to withdraw his suit for degames Hied by him…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492