| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1992 SLG 2150 1992 SLD 2150 1992 PLJ 441 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 5035 of 1992, dismissed on 21.7.1992. Date of hearing: 14.7,1992.
MALIK MUHAMMAD QAYYUM, J
Miss Angela Marck, Advocate for Petitioner. Ch. Muhammad Farooq, Legal Advisor, University of Punjab.
Writ Petition No. 5035 of 1992, dismissed on 21.7.1992. Date of hearing: 14.7,1992.
MALIK MUHAMMAD QAYYUM, J
Miss Angela Marck, Advocate for Petitioner. Ch. Muhammad Farooq, Legal Advisor, University of Punjab.
Syed MUHAMMAD ASADUR REHMAN
VS
UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB--Respondent
Law:
Section:
Educational Institutions- —-F,E.L.--Examination of-Whether a candidate appearing in examination in parts, is entitled to grace marks under Regulation No. 4 relating to L.L.B. Examination-Question of—According to Regulation No. 4, University is under an obligation to grant 5 grace marks or less, but this concession cannot be made applicable to cases covered by third proviso to Regulation under which, a candidate who has taken examination La parts, is disentitled to award of any grace marks-Held: Petitioner having appeared in papers IV, V and VI and not in whole examination, his case is squarely covered by proviso under which he is not entitled to any grace marks-Petition dismissed. [Pp.443444]AB JUDGMENT The petitioner appeared in the 1st Annual F.E.L. Examination of 1990 held in November, 1990 and failed in papers IV, V and VI. Subsequently, he took the Ilnd Annual F.E.L. Examination of 1990 which was held in July, 1991. This time he failed in Papers IV and VI. He represented to the University of Punjab through a written application that he was entitled to four grace marks in paper VI under Regulation No. 4 relating to LL.B. Examination appearing at page 193 of the Calendar (Vol.II), 1968-69, as amended by Notification No. 517/G.M. dated 12th March, 1975. This representation remained unanswered which obliged the petitioner to file this petition praying for a direction to the respondents to award him four grace marks in Paper VI and to declare the revised result accordingly. 2. In the written statement filed by the respondents, they have disputed the entitlement of the petitioner to the grace marks on the basis that this concession is available in case of a candidate who had appeared in the examination as a whole and cannot be availed of by those who appeared in a part of the examination. 3. Reliance has been placed by the respondents upon 3rd proviso to Regulation No. 4. 4. Before proceeding to examine the respective contentions of the parties Regulation No. 4. relating to LL.B. Examination which appears at page 93 of the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492