| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1990 SLG 1468 1990 SLD 1468 1990 PLC 585 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeals Nos. SUK-189 and 190 of 1985, decided on 24th May, 1988.
ALI NAWAZ BUDHANI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Muhammad Humayoon for Appellants. Ali Amjad for
Respondents.
Appeals Nos. SUK-189 and 190 of 1985, decided on 24th May, 1988.
ALI NAWAZ BUDHANI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Muhammad Humayoon for Appellants. Ali Amjad for
Respondents.
Messrs PAKISTAN NATIONAL PRODUCE COMPANY LTD., SHIKARPUR
VS
NAWAB ALI and another Messrs PAKISTAN NATIONAL PRODUCE COMPANY LTD., SHIKARPUR vs NAWAB ALI and another
Law:
Section:
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)-- ---S.O.1 --Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Ss.25-A & 38(3)--Permanent workman---Appointment made for purely temporary job for specific period---Services terminated before expiry of specified period and employee receiving without protest full and final payment in settlement of dues---Fresh appointment again for specific period. accepted but services again terminated and employee received dues in full and final settlement of dues---Grievance petition contending that having served for more than nine months, employee had attained status of a permanent workman---Held, employee having received money in settlement of dues and having accepted fresh appointment again for a specific period, was not an aggrieved person to maintain grievance petition. DECISION These are two separate appeals filed by the appellants establishment against two separate impugned orders, both dated 17-6-1985, passed by the Sind Labour .Court No.VII at Sukkur, who had allowed both the grievance petitions under section 25-A, I.R.O. 1969, filed separately by each respondent, directing their reinstatement in service with full back benefits. As a common point of law is involved in both these appeals, therefore, I would decide both these two appeals by this single decision. 2. Brief facts of the cases are that both the respondents were initially employed in the appellants' contract project viz., Sind Irri. Project as Accounts Assistant at a monthly salary of Rs.1,210 in Grade III on 29-11-1982 and 9-9-1982 respectively, as per Sind Irri. Project, Rice mills of private parties were taken on lease for one season by the appellants establishment and during this period of probation, their services were terminated with effect from 15-11-1983 and in token of receipt of the termination letters, both the respondents had received their dues in full and final settlement without challenging the actions of the management, in any manner. Thereafter, the appellants establishment had got extension of work, therefore, both of them were offered purely temporary the jobs for a specific period of only six…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492