| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1991 SLG 1609 1991 SLD 1609 1991 PLC 462 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Revision Application No. SUK-258 of 1989, decision dated: 18-01-1990.
AHMED ALI U. QURESHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Mahmood Abdul Ghani, Representative for Informants. Nemo for
Respondent.
Revision Application No. SUK-258 of 1989, decision dated: 18-01-1990.
AHMED ALI U. QURESHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Mahmood Abdul Ghani, Representative for Informants. Nemo for
Respondent.
Messrs SUI GAS TRANSIMISSION CO. LIMITED
VS
ABDUL JABBAR
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----S.25-A-Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance), Act (LIII of 1952)--Dismissal from service---Respondent, an employee of Sui Gas Transmission Company Limited, was dismissed---Contention of petitioner-Company that provisions of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 were not attracted in case of employees of petitioner-Company as Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act 1952, was made applicable by Government of Pakistan to employees of petitioner Company---Held, Labour Courts still had jurisdiction to grant relief of reinstatement to workman under S. 25-A, Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, which power had not been taken away under provisions of Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952 as authority appointed under said Act could not grant such relief. Karachi Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. v. National Industrial Relations Commission and another P L D 1982 S C 125 ref. Pakistan Television Corporation v. M. Babar Zaman and others 1989 SCMR1549 rel. Date of hearing: 18th January, 1990. DECISION By this Revision Application the Informants have invoke suo Motu revisional jurisdiction of this Tribunal under section 38(3-a) of I.R.O., 1969, in order to examine the correctness, legallity and propriety of the proceedings pending before the learned Sindh Labour Court No. VII, Sukkur in application No.3 of 1989 under section 25-A of the I.R.O., 1969. 2. I have heard Mr. Mahmood Abdul Ghani, learned representative for the Informants. None is present for the respondent. I have also gone through the record and proceedings of the case. 3. It appears that the respondent had filed an application under section 25-A, I.R.O., 1969, seeking relief against his dismissal by the Informants viz. Sui Gas Transmission Company Ltd: 4. The main contention of Mr. Mahmood Abdul Ghani is, that the provisions of I.R.O., 1969, are not attracted in the case of employees of the informants as the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952 (hereinafter called the `Act') is made applicable by the Government of Pakistan to the employees of the informant Company. He has mainly relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Supreme…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492