Case Details

Citation(s)
1990 SLG 1498 1990 SLD 1498 1990 PLC 641
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. Hyd. 312 of 1986, decided on 22nd November, 1989.
AHMED ALI U. QURESHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NA. Talpur for Appellant. S. Fasahat Hussain Rizvi for
Respondents.

GENERAL MANAGER, FOUR SUGAR MILLS, KHOSKY, DISTRICT BADIN

VS

MUZAFFAR IQBAL and another

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)- ----S. 25-A---West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S.O. 15---Termination of service---Employee was charge-sheeted for fraudulent entries in Gross Weight Register which before Enquiry Officer he admitted---Act of employee which caused wrongful loss thus stood proved against him as employee had not denied this fact even before the Labour Court---Contents of charge-sheet that employee was guilty of misconduct under clause (b) of Standing Order 15(3) were also established---Order of reinstatement of employee. passed by Labour Court was set aside in circumstances. DECISION This is an appeal against the order of the learned Presiding Officer, Sindh Labour Court No. VI at Hyderabad, dated 5-10-1986, whereby he allowed the grievance petitions filed by the respondents and ordered their reinstatement. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents were employees of the appellants. On 20th and 30th March, 1985 they are alleged to have made fraudulent entries in the Gross Weight and Tare Register in respect of Token No.126, Indent No. 12092 in the name of Rehmatullah and in respect of Token No. 9, Indent No. 15522 also in the name of Rehmatullah. They were charge-­sheeted on 8-4-1985, and after due enquiry their services were terminated by order, dated 30-6-1985. Both of them served grievance notices upon the appellants and thereafter filed grievance petitions which were allowed by the learned Presiding Officer by the single impugned order. 3. I have heard Mr. NA. Talpur, Advocate for the appellants and Mr. S. Fasahat Hussain Rizvi, Advocate for the respondents. 4. Mr. Talpur does not press his appeal against respondent Mughees Ahmed, therefore, the appeal against Mughees Ahmed is dismissed. 5. With regard to Muzaffar Iqbal, the main reliance is placed upon his statement before the Enquiry Officer wherein he had admitted, that he had made these entries. He had further admitted, that he had taken two indents in the name of Rehmatullah through his brother Mr. Muhammad Ali, Cane Supervisor to help his friends M/s. Ali Nawaz & Salahuddin who were in need of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492