Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-- ---Ss. 2(xxiv) & 40(2)---Settlement comes to an end on expiry of period agreed to by parties but benefits derived from settlement continue till parties enter into negotiations and reach a conclusion---Demand notice served by C.B.A. after expiry of period fixed in settlement serves purpose of notice to terminate settlement where service of such notice is necessary---Such demand notice becomes negotiable ---Demand notice though involving financial implications would not he illegal. JUDGMENT This is an appeal emerging from the order dated 2-4-1989 recorded by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 5, Sargodha Camp at Faisalabad, whereby the grievance petition brought by the despondent under section 34 if the Industrial Relation Ordinance, 1969, wherein fresh demand notice involving financial implications given by the appellant union was challenged, was accepted. 2. A settlement was arrived at between the parties on 18-4-1988, wherein the period for which the settlement was to remain effective was fixed. On 1-3-1989 afresh demand notice was served by the appellant upon the respondent involving financial implications. The parties were negotiating on the demand notice but before some decision could be arrived at, the respondent challenged it under section 34 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. The ground on which the demand notice was challenged was that since no notice as required…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492