Case Details

Citation(s)
1991 SLG 1958 1991 SLD 1958 1991 PLC 878
Service Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. 47 of 1988, decided on 30th March, 1989.
MUNAWAR ALI KHAN, CHAIRMAN AND MOBEEN AHMAD KHAN, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

AFZAL MEHDI

VS

CHIEF SECRETARY and 2 others AFZAL MEHDI vs CHIEF SECRETARY and 2 others

Law:

Section:

(a) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973)--- ---S.8--Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Confirmation and Seniority) Rules, 1975, R.9--Sindh Government Food Department Notification No.SOF(V)/76, dated 29-12-1987 & Notification No.SOIX(Reg.) (S&GAD/2/1/1-74, dated 24-4-1985-­Seniority--Appellant working as Assistant Director, Food, was aggrieved by Notification dated 29-12-1987 whereby appellant had been assigned lower position vis-a-vis respondent, a Rationing Controller--Rule 9(1) of Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Confirmation and Seniority) Rules, 1975, was amended by Sindh Government Notification dated 24-4-1985 whereby word `grade' in the said Rule was replaced with word `cadre'--Word "cadre" having wider connotation. and despite above amendment, Rule 9(1) of Seniority Rules still required that in each cadre of Department, separate Seniority List was to be prepared for a group of civil servants who were assigned similar duties/functions and possessed same eligibility for appointment-- Officers of specked designation, such as District Food Controllers, Ward Rationing Officers etc., included in List form a separate group by themselves for purpose of drawing up a separate seniority list for such group, provided their duties/functions and qualifications for appointment were different from those of other group/groups of civil servants borne on seniority list--Post of District Food Controller was superior, inasmuch as it was to be filled as per recruitment rules, by appointing senior-most Ward Rationing Officer and by later amendment it was to be filled by promotion from amongst the Ward Rationing Officers--District Food Controller stood on higher footing as compared to Ward Rationing Officer despite the fact that both the posts were placed in Grade-16--Unless separate Seniority List was prepared for Ward Rationing Officers, necessary competition for selecting a suitable person from amongst them for promotion in post of District Food Controller could not be held--Combined Seniority List for posts of District Food Controller and Ward Rationing Officers was not valid being against rules--Respondent belonging to a group of Ward Rationing Officers, held, could not…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492