Case Details

Citation(s)
1991 SLG 1960 1991 SLD 1960 1991 PLC 867
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. HYD-27 of 1991, decided 29th May, 1991
AHMED ALI U. QURESHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

SALEEMUDDIN CHUNDRIGAR

VS

SALEEMUDDIN CHUNDRIGAR vs SINDH SEED CORPORATION, HYDERABAD and 3 others

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----S. 25-A---Grievance petition---Respondents who were promoted, were downgraded, but subsequently without notice to petitioner worker their promotion was again restored-:-Worker made representation praying that he should also be given promotion, but his representation was rejected and his appeal against rejection of his representation was also rejected as time-barred--­Workman again gave grievance notice which remained un-replied by employer--­Grievance petition filed by worker was contested by employer on ground that both grievance notice and petition were time-barred contending that same were filed long after restoration of promotion of co-workers ---Worker admittedly having no knowledge of restoration of promotion of co-worker, cause of action had accrued to him on date when his representation for promotion was finally rejected by employer---Grievance notice given within 3 months from date of accrual of cause of action and grievance petition admittedly filed within 2 months of grievance notice, could not thus be considered as time-barred. 1986 S C M R 30 ref. Syed Fasahat Hussain Rizvi for Appellant. Bashir Awan for Respondents Nos, 2, 3 and 4. Date of hearing: 8th May, 1991. DECISION This is an appeal against the order, dated 2-1-1991 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Sindh Labour Court No. VI at Hyderabad, whereby his grievance application was rejected as time-barred. . 2. 1 have heard Mr. Syed Fasahat Hussain Rizvi, learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Bashir Awan, learned Advocate for Respondents Nos. 2, 3 and 4 and have also gone through the record and proceedings of the case. 3. The appellant joined as Clerk on 16-6-1978 and was promoted on 22-4-1987 in BPS-11. One Maula Bux Moughal, respondent No. 4, joined on 16-7-1977. He was promoted in BPS-11 on 9-4-1987 and was given BPS-15 on 10-10-1989. Abdul Majeed Bhurt, respondent No. 2 joined as Storekeeper on 8-12-1987 in BPS-15. Niaz A. Moughal, respondent No. 3, joined as Office Assistant on 16-6-1988 in BPS-15. On representation of the appellant respondents Nos. 2 and 3 were downgraded to BPS-11 but were subsequently restored to BPS-15 on…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492