| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2000 SLG 1606 2000 SLD 1606 2000 PLC 283 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
Revision Petition No. 556 of 1999, decision dated: 13-12-1999
MIAN GHULAM AHMAD, CHAIRMAN
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Revision Petition No. 556 of 1999, decision dated: 13-12-1999
MIAN GHULAM AHMAD, CHAIRMAN
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
HABIB BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, KARACHI and 4 others
VS
MUHAMMAD ARSHAD MAHMOOD CHEEMA
Law:
Section:
Industrial dispute Practice, Practice and procedure Law intended and ordained that matter should primarily, at least initially, be brought under discussion by Labour Court and thereafter by Labour Appellate Tribunal Procedure as also proprietary and expediency and wisdom of the process required and dictated that Court of first instance should proceed with the matter on entertaining it and even at the initial stage should render well considered, sane, sound, judicious balanced and equitably maintainable order. JUDGMENT Ch. Nabi Ahmad, Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gujranwala directed maintenance of status quo, by rendering an interim order on 5 11 1999, on entertaining grievance petition, having been filed by Muhammad Arshad Mehmood Cheema, a Bank Officer, against the Authorities of the Habib Bank Ltd. The order was made clearer, by further directing that the officer's ouster from service would not take place, if by then the orders of his dismissal/removal from service had not been rendered and conveyed by the competent Authority. This amounted to issuance of an injunction order against the Bank people, who preferred the present revision petition on 10 11 1999. I distinctly recall that Ch. Ghulam Qadir Cheema, Advocate kept sitting in this Court, throughout the day, on 10th and again on 11th of November, as he was probably expecting that the Bank Authorities would be having recourse to this Tribunal, agitating against the aforesaid order, dated 5 11 1999 of the learned Labour Court, copy of which had been made available to the employee on 8 11 1999. 9 11 1999 was a gazetted holiday, being the Birth day of Allama Iqbal. The revision petition 'was filed on 10 11 1999, late in the day, it appears, and it was proposed by the office to be placed before the Court on the following day, i.e. on 11 11 19951. 2. The learned counsel for the parties had consume ample time, exceeding three hours, in making and concluding their address. I, however, feel that it was all an unnecessary exercise. If the learned counsel for the parties were to make submissions and raise contentions, covering the whole compass, nothing would be left for the Labour Court for consideration and…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492