| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2000 SLG 1660 2000 SLD 1660 2000 PLC 481 |
National Industrial Relations Commission
Appeal No.12(199) L of 1998, decision dated: 18-08-1999
KHAWAJA MAHMOOD AHMAD, CHAIRMAN, ABDUL RASHID KHAN AND NABI BAKHSH BHATTI, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No.12(199) L of 1998, decision dated: 18-08-1999
KHAWAJA MAHMOOD AHMAD, CHAIRMAN, ABDUL RASHID KHAN AND NABI BAKHSH BHATTI, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CENTRAL CIVIL DIVISION II PAK. PWD, 1 EGERTON ROAD, LAHORE and 2 others
VS
MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA and another
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) Ss. 22 A(8)(g) & 22 D Revision Unfair labour practice by employer¬ Employee appointed as "work Mistri" was promoted as Foreman, but his promotion subsequently was cancelled by Competent Authority and employee was reverted to his original post of work Mistri Employee had alleged that his reversion was on account of his trade union activities and that employer in reverting 'him had committed unfair labour practice Employee had not been able to prove that his reversion was made on account of his trade union activities Employee even in his petition' filed against his reversion under S.22 A(8)(g) of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, except general allegations, had not mentioned any particular instance Employee could have a good case in some other forum, but not before National Industrial Relations Commission because jurisdiction of the Commission was limited only to the extent of unfair labour practice and it had no general jurisdiction. PLD 1969 SC 407 ref. ORDER ABDUR RASHID KHAN (MEMBER). This appeal is directed against the order dated 8 10 1998 passed by Mr. Bahadar Ali Learned Member N. I.R.C. whereby he has accepted the petition of the respondent. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent was appointed as Work Mistri on 13 9 1983 and he was promoted as Foreman on 6 7 1994 by the appellants. The respondent was reverted by the appellants on 8 11 1994 on account of trade union activities with mala fide intention and without giving any notice to the respondent. The respondent further contends that there are two groups of trade union known as Labour Union Pak PWD (C.&A.) had he was the President of one of the group known as Mustafa Group. The appellant being annoyed by his lawful trade union activities, the reversion was taken place due to the above said reasons: 3. On the other hand learned counsel for…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492