Case Details

Citation(s)
2000 SLG 1663 2000 SLD 1663 2000 PLC 495
National Industrial Relations Commission
Appeal No 12(27) of 1999 L, decision dated: 18-08-1999
KAHAWAJA MAHMOOD AHMAD, CHAIRMAN, BAHADAR ALI AND ABDUR RASHID KHAN, MEMBERS

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

KARAM DIN

VS

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, PIAC, LAHORE AIRPORT, LAHORE and another Industrial Relations

Law:

Section:

Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) Ss. 22 A(8)(g)) & 22 D Dismissal from service on ground of misconduct Appeal Maintainability Appellant/employee after issuing him show cause notice and after holding enquiry and affording him opportunity of hearing, had alleged in his petition filed against his dismissal after 11 years of his dismissal from service that he had been dismissed from service on account of trade union activities Appellant/employee having failed to make out case of unfair labour practice against employer, petition filed by appellant/employee against his dismissal from service after lapse of 11 years, was rightly dismissed by Single Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission In absence of any cogent reason, appeal against said dismissal order was dismissed being without force. ORDER ABDUR RASHID KHAN (MEMBER). This order is directed against the impugned order dated 22 2 1999 passed by learned member Mr. Nabi Bakhsh Bhatti 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant has been serving as Loader under the respondent since 26 10 1970 and was dismissed from service on 17 10 1982. The appellant contends that his dismissal from service was on account of trade union activities and he filed petition against the respondent alleging that the order of dismissal is mala fide, illegal, discriminatory based on victimisation and unfair labour practice and prayed for acceptance of the petition. On the other hand, the respondent filed written statement and raised numeral objections such as, that the petition is hopelessly barred by time, petition is not maintainable, the order of review board was re-commendatory and, that the petitioner failed to make out case of unfair labour practice etc. Learned counsel for the respondent further contended that the appellant was served with a charge sheet after holding enquiry and proper chance of personal hearing was given to him, second show cause notice was also given to him and consequently, the appellant was dismissed from service by the competent Authority on the ground of misconduct. It is further contended that the learned Member…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492