| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2000 SLG 1681 2000 SLD 1681 2000 PLC 608 |
National Industrial Relations Commission
Cases Nos.4A(441)/99 L, 4A(642)/98 L, 4A(704)/98 L and 4A(720)/98 L, decision dated: 27-09-1999
NABI BAKHSH BHATTI, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Cases Nos.4A(441)/99 L, 4A(642)/98 L, 4A(704)/98 L and 4A(720)/98 L, decision dated: 27-09-1999
NABI BAKHSH BHATTI, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMAD HANIF and others
VS
CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR (AUQAF) and others
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) S.22A(8)(g) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S. Os.l(b) & 15(4) Permanent workman Termination of service Employees who had been serving for the last so many years, their services were terminated without issuing them charge sheet, show cause notice and without holding proper enquiry against them length of service of employees in the department was more than nine months and works/posts against which they were appointed were of permanent nature and were likely to last for more than nine months Employees, in circumstances, having attained status of permanent employees, their services could not have been terminated without issuing them charge-sheet, show cause notice, holding proper enquiry and assigning any reason. PLD 1996 SC 610 and Managing Director, WASA, LDA, Lahore v. Barkat Masih and another Civil Appeal No. 1650/L of 1998 ref. ORDER Since in almost all the cases in hand, a common question of law and fact is involved, hence I intend to dispose of all the cases with a common order. 2. All the aforesaid petitions were filed by the petitioners employed in Auqaf Department under section 22 A' (8) (g) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 based upon the alleged acts of unfair labour practice on the part of the respondents whereby the petitioners contended that they are serving under the Administrative control of the respondents since long and fall within the definition of workmen. It is also alleged that they have more than two years' service at the credit of each petitioner and their work is satisfactory because no disciplinary action is pending against any one of them on the basis of any complaint. It is specifically stated in the petitions that they are members of Auqaf Head Office Employees' Union (Reid.) and are on the electoral roll of the said union, and are taking keen interest in the lawful trade union activities which annoyed the respondents and particularly respondent No.2 who has been trying to restrain the petitioners from taking part in the lawful trade union activities which is their lawful right. It is further alleged that the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492